Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
a + b
i
p i (1
a− 1
p ) a + b−i
1
α
i =0
and it finishes the proof.
Lemma 6.
1. The 4ft-quantifier
p,Base of founded implication satisfies the condition
b from the lemma 1 for each 0 <p
1 and Base > 0 .
! p,α,Base of lower critical implication satisfies the con-
dition b from the lemma 1 for each 0 <p< 1 , 0 <α< 0 . 5 and
Base > 0 .
2. The 4ft-quantifier
Proof.
1. We have to prove that for each a
0 , b
0 such that
p,Base ( a,b )=0
there is a
p,Base ( a ,b )=1 . The proof is trivial, we
a for that it is
a
a + b =1 .
2. We have to prove that for each a
use the fact that lim a→∞
0 and b
0 such that it is satisfied
!
p,α,Base ( a,b )=0 there is a
!
p,α,Base ( a ,b )=1 .
a for that it is
! p,α,Base
Let us suppose that
( a,b )=0 . It means that a < Base or
i = a a + i p i (1
a + b
p ) a + b−i >α.
According to the Lemma 4 there is natural n such that for each e, e>n
and k =0 ,...,b it is
e + b
e + k
p e + k (1
α
b +1 ·
p ) b−k <
Let us choose a =max
. Then it is a
{
a,n,Base
}
Base and also
a + b
i
p i (1
a + b
p ) a + b−i
i = a
a + b
a + k
p a + k (1
b
p ) b−k <α.
=
k =0
! p,α,Base ( a ,b )=1 and it finishes the proof.
Thus it is
Theorem 6. The 4ft-quantifier
p,Base of founded implication is not classi-
cally definable for each 0 <p
1 and Base > 0 .
! p,α,Base of lower critical implication is not classically
definable for each 0 <p< 1 , 0 <α< 0 . 5 and Base > 0 .
The 4ft-quantifier
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search