Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 7.9
Typical Parameters Used in Electrochemical Therapy Instruments
Clinical
Method of
Typical
Typical Current
Application
Current Delivery
Waveform
or Voltage
Electrochemical
Two or more platinum needle
Dc
5 to 100 mA with a voltage
destruction of
electrodes positioned under local
compliance of up to 20 V
tumors
anesthesia in or at the site of the
to deliver a total charge of
tumor with an interelectrode
approximately 30 to
distance of
3 cm
100 C/mL of tumor
volume
Attract lymphocytes
12-
µ
m-diameter IROX-coated wire
Charge-balanced biphasic current
20
µ
A to yield
500 to
to solid tumors or
electrodes in the tumor or
pulses 400
µ
s in duration delivered
2000
µ
C/cm 2
infections
infection and large platinum
at 200 Hz for 10 minutes to
reference electrode at remote site
8 hours per session
technique was e
cial
tumors only was 80.2%. However, because most of the trials were conducted at centers that
are not bound by the strict research methodologies prescribed by the FDA to prove safety
and e
ff
ective in 76% of cases. The e
ff
ectiveness rate reported for super
fi
ectiveness, we must consider these results to be mere anecdotal evidence that EChT
may become a useful tool in the
ff
fight against cancer.
Unfortunately, EChT is not being given the attention that it deserves to rigorously prove
or disprove its clinical e
fi
cacy. The problem is that the pioneer of the technique, Swedish
physician Björn E. W. Nordenström, believes that the body has a second circulatory sys-
tem of continuous energy circulation that he calls a biologically closed electrical circuit
(BCEC). He believes that these currents participate in maintaining homeostasis and in con-
trolling the healing process in living organisms, and presents EChT as a direct application
of his BCEC concepts. This not only attracts the attention of a lot of quacks, but also makes
the principle of EChT unpalatable to most mainstream oncologists.
In a somewhat related application, U.S. patent 6,038,478 to Yuen et al. [2000] describes
the use of low-current biphasic pulses to attract lymphocytes to sites that can be accessed
through surgery to place an array of electrodes. The technique is said to be useful in the
treatment of solid tumors or in the treatment of certain infections, especially in poorly vas-
cularized (e.g., brain) or inaccessible areas where surgical intervention is unadvised and
electrode placement is feasible and less destructive.
Induction of Apoptosis via Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields
Apoptosis is the process by which a cell actively commits suicide, which is essential for
maintaining tissue homeostasis. Cancer is believed to result from the failure to regulate
apoptosis properly. High-intensity (
300 kV/cm), nanosecond (10 to 300 ns) pulsed electric
fi
fields (nsPEFs) are now being investigated as a tool to trigger apoptosis in cancerous tis-
sue (Table 7.10). The hypothesized working principle behind nsPEF is cytochrome c
release into the cytoplasm, suggesting that nsPEF targets the mitochondria, which are the
initiators of apoptosis. This technique, pioneered by researchers at Old Dominion
University in Norfolk, Virginia [Schoenbach et al., 2001], is still in its infancy, and its clin-
ical e
cacy, if any, is yet to be demonstrated.
Embolic Therapy
The traditional treatment for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm to prevent rebleeding is
through microsurgery. The method comprises a step of clipping the neck of the aneurysm,
Search WWH ::




Custom Search