Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4.4
Direct measurements of the momentum flux using profiling techniques (updated from Engelbart et al.
2007
)
Device
Reference
Res./range
Examination
Restriction
RADAR
Scanning and dual,
10 GHz
Rabin et al. (
1982
)
Kropfli (
1986
)
~100/200-2000 m
Isolated comparison
with mast and
aircraft
Shortage of scatterers
Scanning, 10 GHZ +
chaff
Schneider and Lilly (
1999
) ~100/200-3500 m
Comparison with mast
and aircraft
Chaff air contamination
Five-beam, 1.238 GHz Puygrenier et al. (
2004
)
75-2000 m
Comparison with
aircraft
Ground clutter
LIDAR
Scanning
Eberhard et al. (
1989
)
Gal-Chen et al. (
1992
)
~100/400-1500 m
Tested
Integration time of ~1.5
hours
Scanning and dual
Levinson (
1998
)
Middleton and Davies
(
2004
)
~100/400-1500 m
Used in urban
turbulence studies
Integration time of ~1.5
hours
Scanning
Pichugina et al. (
2005b
)
Banta et al. (
2006
)
Smalikho et al. (
2005
)
~30/50-300 m
Comparison with mast,
used in low-level jet
studies
SODAR
Phased-array system
Helmis et al. (
2004
)
40/50-400 m
Tested
Low sampling rate
Vertically pointing
Kouznetsov et al. (
2004
)
Kouznetsov et al. (
2007
)
20-400 m
Experimental
Additional assumptions
needed
RADAR-RASS
915 MHz
Angevine et al (
1993a
,
b
)
~100/150-900 m
Comparison with
aircraft
1235 MHz
Peters and Kirtzel (
1994
)
Lippmann et al. (
1996
)
Hirsch and Peters (
1998
)
~40/120-800 m
Tested
Special measurement mode
Search WWH ::
Custom Search