Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4.4 Direct measurements of the momentum flux using profiling techniques (updated from Engelbart et al. 2007 )
Device
Reference
Res./range
Examination
Restriction
RADAR
Scanning and dual,
10 GHz
Rabin et al. ( 1982 )
Kropfli ( 1986 )
~100/200-2000 m
Isolated comparison
with mast and
aircraft
Shortage of scatterers
Scanning, 10 GHZ +
chaff
Schneider and Lilly ( 1999 ) ~100/200-3500 m
Comparison with mast
and aircraft
Chaff air contamination
Five-beam, 1.238 GHz Puygrenier et al. ( 2004 )
75-2000 m
Comparison with
aircraft
Ground clutter
LIDAR
Scanning
Eberhard et al. ( 1989 )
Gal-Chen et al. ( 1992 )
~100/400-1500 m
Tested
Integration time of ~1.5
hours
Scanning and dual
Levinson ( 1998 )
Middleton and Davies
( 2004 )
~100/400-1500 m
Used in urban
turbulence studies
Integration time of ~1.5
hours
Scanning
Pichugina et al. ( 2005b )
Banta et al. ( 2006 )
Smalikho et al. ( 2005 )
~30/50-300 m
Comparison with mast,
used in low-level jet
studies
SODAR
Phased-array system
Helmis et al. ( 2004 )
40/50-400 m
Tested
Low sampling rate
Vertically pointing
Kouznetsov et al. ( 2004 )
Kouznetsov et al. ( 2007 )
20-400 m
Experimental
Additional assumptions
needed
RADAR-RASS
915 MHz
Angevine et al ( 1993a , b )
~100/150-900 m
Comparison with
aircraft
1235 MHz
Peters and Kirtzel ( 1994 )
Lippmann et al. ( 1996 )
Hirsch and Peters ( 1998 )
~40/120-800 m
Tested
Special measurement mode
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search