Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Ta b l e 4 .
Execution times in minutes and speedup for each program using
4
processors
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Time
SU
Time
SU
Time
SU
Time
SU
Time
SU
Time
SU
P1
0
.
002 1
.
00 0
.
308 1
.
00 7
.
838 1
.
00 62
.
653 1
.
00 203
.
757 1
.
00 297
.
930 1
.
00
P2
0
.
001 2
.
00 0
.
199 1
.
55 5
.
053 1
.
55 30
.
676 2
.
04
94
.
173 2
.
16 135
.
907 2
.
19
P3
0
.
001 2
.
00 0
.
098 3
.
14 2
.
473 3
.
17 19
.
488 3
.
21
59
.
724 3
.
41
95
.
360 3
.
12
P4
0
.
004 0
.
50 0
.
078 3
.
95 1
.
998 3
.
92 16
.
072 3
.
90
51
.
830 3
.
93
86
.
175 3
.
45
P5
0
.
002 1
.
00 0
.
101 3
.
05 2
.
494 3
.
14 19
.
933 3
.
14
63
.
464 3
.
21
95
.
158 3
.
13
P6
0
.
005 0
.
40 0
.
091 3
.
38 2
.
251 3
.
48 18
.
013 3
.
48
59
.
810 3
.
40
89
.
064 3
.
34
P7
0
.
004 0
.
50 0
.
089 3
.
46 2
.
232 3
.
51 17
.
754 3
.
53
57
.
699 3
.
53
85
.
988 3
.
46
P8
0
.
003 0
.
67 0
.
090 3
.
42 2
.
245 3
.
49 17
.
926 3
.
49
59
.
453 3
.
43
88
.
422 3
.
37
mentioning that Program
7
is built by a combination of the parallelized tasks B and
C, parallelizing the
for
loops that cover the range of average inter-vehicle distances and
the number of combinations resulting from the technology penetration rate respectively.
We obtain thus:
-
Sequential time (P
1
):
297
.
975
minutes.
-
Parallel time (P
7
):
156
.
433
minutes.
The achieved speedup (P
1
/P
7
)is
1
.
9
, which implies an improvement of around
47
.
5%
referred to the execution time.
6.2
Execution with
4
Processors
The computation times resulting from the execution of the eight programs with the
selected penetration rates of CCA technology using
4
processors are presented in Table
4 and depicted in Figure 4.
When the CCA penetration rate equals the
50%
we reach the highest computational
load. So we also analyze the results with this penetration rate using
4
processors, focus-
ing on the best and worst execution times achieved. The reference is still the sequential
Program
1
with a duration of
297
.
93
minutes (around
5
hours). If we make a compar-
ison among the parallelized programs we conclude that the best result is given again
by the Program
7
with a calculation time of
85
.
988
minutes (around
1
.
43
hours). We
obtain thus:
-
Sequential time (P
1
):
297
.
93
minutes.
-
Parallel time (P
7
):
85
.
988
minutes.
The achieved speedup is
3
.
46
, which implies an improvement of around
71
.
1%
referred
to the execution time.
6.3
Execution with
8
Processors
The computation times resulting from the execution of the eight programs with the
selected penetration rates of CCA technology using
8
processors are gathered in
Table 5 and illustrated in Figure 5.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search