INTERPRETING SECURITY IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTIONS - Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations - page 273

organizational and computer-technical knowledge, thus allowing designers a better ability to
incorporate a more rounded design solution that seeks to minimize security threats and maximize
user satisfaction. It should be noted that further research in the form of case studies should be
conducted that would entail a more extensive analysis by applying the framework presented in
Table 13.3 to specific organizational situations.
REFERENCES
Abrazhevich, D. A survey of user attitudes towards electronic payment systems. In The 15th Annual
Conference of the Human Computer Interaction Group of the British Computer Socie ty, vol. 2. Toulouse,
France: Cepadues-Editions, 2001, pp. 69-71.
Andersen, P.B. What semiotics can and cannot do for HCI. Knowledge-Base Systems , 14 (2001), 419-424.
Barley, S.R. Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 28 (1983), 393-413.
Backhouse, J., and Dhillon, G. Structures of responsibility and security of information systems. European
Journal of Information Systems , 5, 1 (1996), 2-9.
Bishop, M. Computer Security: Art and Science. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
Braf, E. Knowledge or information—what makes the difference? IFIP 8.1 Conference, Montreal. In
Proceedings of Organizational Semiotics: Evolving a Science of Information Systems , 2001.
Connolly, J.H., and Phillips, I.W. User-system interface design—an organisation semiotic perspective. In
K. Liu, R.J. Clarke, P.B. Andersen, and R.K. Stamper (eds.), Organizational Semiotics — Evolving a Science
of Information Systems . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp. 119-132.
Dhillon, G., and Backhouse, J. Risks in the use of information technology within organizations.
International Journal of Information Management , 16, 1 (1996), 65-74.
Dhillon, G., and Backhouse, J. Information system security management in the new millennium.
Communications of the ACM , 43, 7 (2000), 125-128.
Dhillon, G., and Backhouse, J. Current directions in IS security research: towards socio-organizational per-
spectives. Information Systems Journal , 11, 2 (2001), 127-153.
Falkenberg, E.; Hesse, W.; Lindgreen, P.; Nilsson, B.; Oei, H.; Rolland, C.; Stamper, R.; Van Assche, F.;
Verrijn-Stuart, A.; and Voss, K. Frisco Report: A Framework of Information System Concepts . International
Federation for Information Processing (IFIP), 1998.
Kitiyadisai, K. Relevance and information systems. PhD thesis, London School of Economics, University of
London, 1991.
Liebenau, J., and Backhouse, J. Understanding Information . London: Macmillan, 1990.
Liu, K. Semiotics for information systems engineering—reduce the gap between specification, design, and
implementation. 1st Int. Workshop on Interpretative Approaches to Information Systems & Computing
Research (SIG-IAM 2002). Brunel, UK: 2002, pp. 62-65.
Manning, P. Organizational Communication. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992.
Morris, C. Signification and Significance—a Study of the Relation of Signs and Values . Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, 1964.
Myers, B.; Hollan, J.; and Cruz, I. Strategic directions in human-computer interaction. ACM Computing
Surveys , 28, 4 (1996), 794-809.
Nadin, M. A Semiotic Introduction to System Design . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Nah, F., and Davis, S. HCI research issues in electronic commerce. Journal of Electronic Commerce
Research , 3, 3 (2002), 98-113.
Olson, G.M., and Olson, J.S. Human-computer interaction: psychological aspects of the human use of com-
puting. Annual Review of Psychology , 54, 1 (2003), 491-516.
Sjöström, J., and Goldkuhl, G. The semiotics of user interfaces—a socio-pragmatic perspective. 6th
International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics , Reading, UK, July 11-12, 2003.
Stamper, R. Information in Business and Administrative Systems. London: Batsford, 1973.
Zhang, P.; Benbasat, I.; Carey, J.; Davis, F.; Galletta, D.; and Strong, D. Human-computer interaction research
in the MIS discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 9, 20 (2002), 334-355.