Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Main: 25 k
50 s/div
2.14 V
With MPPT Control
0.66 V
Without MPPT Control
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Time (sec)
FIGURE 2.18
Performance of the WEH system with MPPT and without MPPT for charging a supercapacitor.
with MPPT is much higher than its counterpart without the MPPT scheme.
This is because more electrical power is transferred from the wind turbine
through the boost converter with the resistor emulation MPPT scheme to the
supercapacitor. Under a dynamic load condition, changing R load , the closed-
loop resistance emulator is still able to manipulate the duty cycle D of the
boost converter given by Equation 2.6 to maintain R em always at the optimal
resistance value, so that MPPT operation takes place. When the WEH system
is operating with the MPPT scheme, the amount of energy accumulated in the
supercapacitor after 500 s is 3.43 J, which is 10 times more than its counterpart
of 0.33 J; hence, this exhibits the superior performance of the WEH system
with the MPPT scheme over its counterpart under a dynamic load condition.
The charging process seen in Figure 2.19 , is divided into two regions: un-
controllable and controllable. Initially, the supercapacitor is fully discharged,
4000 mV
WINDOW1
4000 mV
WINDOW2
Uncontrollable
Region
Controllable Region
0 mV
0 mV
0 mV
0 mEU
4000 mV
1000 mEU
Load/Supercapacitor Voltage (V)
Duty Cycle
FIGURE 2.19
Illustration of the supercapacitor's charging process using the WEH system with MPPT.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search