Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Scherer, M. J. (Ed.). (2002).
Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful
Rehabilitation
. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Scherer, M. J., and Craddock, G. (2002). Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process.
Technology & Disability, 3
(14), 125-131. Retrieved from http://iospress.metapress.com/content/
g0eft4mnlwly8y8g
Scherer, M. J., and Cushman, L. A. (1995). Differing therapist-patient views of assistive technol-
ogy use and implications for patient education and training.
Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, 76
(6), 595. Retrieved from http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/
journals/0003-9993/PIIS0003999395805214.pdf
Scherer, M. J., Cushman, L. A., and Federici, S. (2004, June 1-10).
Measuring Participation and the
Disability Experience with the “Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment.”
Paper pre-
sented at the North American Collaborating Center 10th
Annual Conference on ICF: NACC 2004,
Halifax, Canada. Retrieved from http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/10NACC_
Conf_Report_FINAL_e.pdf
Scherer, M. J., Federici, S., Tiberio, L., Pigliautile, M., Corradi, F., and Meloni, F. (Early Online).
ICF core set for Matching Older Adults with Dementia and Technology.
Ageing International
.
doi:10.1007/s12126-010-9093-9
Scherer, M. J., and Glueckauf, R. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities
and participation.
Rehabilitation Psychology, 50
(2), 132-141. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.132
Scherer, M. J., and Sax, C. L. (2010). Measures of assistive technology predisposition and use. In
E. Mpofu and T. Oakland (Eds.),
Rehabilitation and Health Assessment. Applying ICF Guidelines
(pp. 229-254). New York: Springer.
Scherer, M. J., Sax, C. L., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L. A., and Scherer, J. V. (2005). Predictors of
assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors.
Disability and
Rehabilitation, 27
(21), 1321-1331. doi:10.1080/09638280500164800
Verza, R., Carvalho, M. L., Battaglia, M. A., and Uccelli, M. M. (2006). An interdisciplinary approach
to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment.
Multiple
Sclerosis, 12
(1), 88-93. doi:10.1191/1352458506ms1233oa
Vincent, C., and Morin, G. (1999). L'utilisation ou non des aides techniques: Comparaison d'un
modèle américain aux besoins de la réalité Québécoise.
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy,
66
(2), 92-101.
Wessels, R. D., Persson, J., Lorentsen, Ø., Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Oortwijn, W., et al. (2002).
IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment.
Technology and Disability, 14
(3), 141-145.
Retrieved from http://iospress.metapress.com/content/2bm793b7pbdah9bw/
World Health Organization (WHO). (2001).
ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability,
and Health
. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2002).
Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and
Health: ICF The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). (2004).
A Glossary of Terms for Community Health Care and Services
for Older Persons
. (WHO/WKC/Tech.Ser./04.2). Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/
wkc/2004/WHO_WKC_Tech.Ser._04.2.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). (2006).
Disability and Rehabilitation WHO Action Plan 2006-2011
.
Retrieved from http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/dar_action_plan_2006to2011.
pdf
World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank. (2011).
World Report on Disability
. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO.
Zimmer, Z., and Chappell, N. L. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults.
Disability
and Rehabilitation, 21
(5-6), 222-230. doi:10.1080/096382899297648
Zola, I. K. (1982).
Disincentives to Independent Living
. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas.
