Measuring Individual Functioning - Assistive Technology Assessment - page 46

Long, T., Huang, L., Woodbridge, M., Woolverton, M., and Minkel, J. (2003). Integrating assistive
technology into an outcome-driven model of service delivery. Infants and Young Children, 16 (4),
272-283. doi:10.1097/00001163-200310000-00002
Madans, J. H., and Altman, B. M. (2006). Purposes of Disability Statistics . Paper presented at the
Training Workshop on Disability statistics for SPECA countries: UN Special Programme for
the Economies of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/
stats/documents/2006.12.health.htm
Madans, J. H., Altman, B. M., Rasch, E. K., Synneborn, M., Banda, J., Mbogoni, M., et al. (2002).
Washington Group Position Paper: Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General
Disability Measure, Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ppt/citygroup/meeting3/
WG3.6a%20Madans_Altman.ppt
Menchetti, B. M., and Sweeney, M. A. (1995). Person-Centered Planning (Technical Assistance Packet 5) .
Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Department of Special Education, Florida Network.
Mezzich, J. E. (2002). Comprehensive diagnosis: A conceptual basis for future diagnostic systems.
Psychopathology, 35 (2-3), 162-165. doi:10.1159/000065138
Mont, D. (2007). Measuring Disability Prevalence. Special Protection Discussion Paper No. 0706 Retrieved
from The World Bank website: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/
Data/MontPrevalence.pdf
Oliver, M., and Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled People and Social Policy: from Exclusion to Inclusion . London:
Longman.
Pearson, E. J. M. (2009). Comfort and its measurement—A literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation:
Assistive Technology, 4 (5), 301-310. doi:10.1080/17483100902980950
Philips, B., and Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology,
5 (1), 36-45. doi:10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205
Rust, K. L., and Smith, R. O. (2006). Perspectives of outcome data from assistive technology develop-
ers. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3 (1), 34-52.
Ryan, S., Campbell, K. A., Rigby, P., Germon, B., Chan, B., and Hubley, D. (2006). Development of the
new Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research,
29 (3), 195-200. doi:10.1097/01.mrr.0000210051.94420.1b
Schalock, R. L., and Alonso, M. A. V. (2002). Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners .
Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. P. M.,
et al. (2010). Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Support (11th ed.).
Washington, DC: AAIDD.
Schalock, R. L., Buntinx, W., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Luckasson, R., Snell, M., Tasse, M., et al. (2007).
User's Guide: Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification and Systems of Supports: Applications for
Clinicians, Educators, Disability Program Managers, and Policy Makers (10th ed.). Washington, DC:
AAMR.
Scherer, M. J. (1998). Matching Person & Technology. A Series of Assessments for Evaluating Predispositions
to and Outcomes of Technology Use in Rehabilitation, Education, the Workplace & Other Settings .
Webster, NY: The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc.
Scherer, M. J., and Craddock, G. (2002). Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment pro-
cess. Technology and Disability, 3 (14), 125-131. Retrieved from http://iospress.metapress.com/
content/g0eft4mnlwly8y8g
Sen, A. (2002). Health: Perception versus observation. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition),
324 (7342), 860-861. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7342.860
Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., and Cicchetti, D. V. (Eds.). (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales . Circle
Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., and Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd ed.).
Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Steiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., and Stucki, G. (2002). Use of the
ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine.
Physical Therapy, 82 (11), 1098-1107.