Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Mitani, S., Fujisawa, S., Mima, A., Shiota, H., Yanashima, K., Takahara, M., et al. (2007). The impor-
tance of measuring medical and psychological characteristics in visibility measurement of
persons with low visual capability. In G. Eizmendi, J. M. Azkoitia, and G. Craddock (Eds.),
Challenges for Assistive Technology: AAATE 07
(pp. 331-335). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Moscovici, S. (1961
). La Psychanalyse, son Image et Son Public
[Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public].
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Nair, K. P. S. (2003). Life goals: The concept and its relevance to rehabilitation.
Clinical Rehabilitation,
17
(2), 192-202. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr599oa
Neisser, U. (1989).
Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in
Categorization
. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Nihei, M., Inoue, T., Kaneshige, Y., and Fujie, M. G. (2007). Proposition of a new mobility aid for older
persons: Reducing psychological conflict associated with the use of assistive technologies. In
G. Eizmendi, J. M. Azkoitia, and G. Craddock (Eds
.), Challenges for Assistive Technology: AAATE
07
(pp. 80-84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Olkin, R. (1999). The personal, professional and political when clients have disabilities.
Women and
Therapy, 22
(2), 87-103. doi:10.1300/J015v22n02_07
Pape, T. L.-B., Kim, J., and Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assis-
tive technology: A review of personal ffactors.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 24
(1-3), 5-20.
doi:10.1080/09638280110066235
Pfeiffer, D. (1998). The ICIDH and the need for its revision.
Disability and Society, 13
(4), 503-523.
Philips, B., and Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment.
Assistive Technology,
5
(1), 36-45. doi:10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205
Plante, T. G. (2005).
Contemporary Clinical Psychology
(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Poston, J. M., and Hanson, W. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic
intervention.
Psychological Assessment, 22
(2), 203-212. doi:10.1037/A001s679
Ricœur, P. (1976).
Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning
. Fort Worth, TX: Texas
Christian Press.
Riemer-Reiss, M. L., and Wacker, R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinu-
ance among individuals with disabilities.
Journal of Rehabilitation, 66
(3), 44-50.
Roulstone, A. (1998). Researching a disabling society: The case of employment and new technology.
In T. Shakespeare (Ed.),
The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives
(pp. 110-128). London:
Cassell.
Scherer, M. J. (1998).
Matching Person & Technology. A Series of Assessments for Evaluating Predispositions
to and Outcomes of Technology Use in Rehabilitation, Education, the Workplace & Other Settings
.
Webster, NY: The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc.
Scherer, M. J. (2000).
Living in the State of Stuck: How Technologies Affect the Lives of People with Disabilities
(3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Scherer, M. J. (Ed.). (2002).
Assistive Technology
:
Matching Device and Consumer for Successful
Rehabilitation
. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Scherer, M. J. (2005).
Cross-Walking the ICF to a Measure of Assistive Technology Predisposition and
Use
. Paper presented at the 11th Annual North American Collaborating Center (NACC)
Conference on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF),
Rochester, NY.
Scherer, M. J., Blair, K. L., Banks, M. E., Brucker, B., Corrigan, J., and Wegener, S. (2004). Rehabilitation
psychology. In W. E. Craighead and C. B. Nemeroff (Eds.),
The Concise Corsini Encyclopedia of
Psychology and Behavioral Science
(3rd ed., pp. 801-802). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Scherer, M. J., Craddock, G., and MacKeogh, T. (2011). The relationship of personal factors and sub-
jective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 33
(10),
811-817. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511418
Scherer, M. J., and Cushman, L. A. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal
cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment
.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 23
(9), 387-393. doi:10.1080/09638280010006665
