Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Strengthened beam analysis:
It is known that the failure mode is brittle crushing (prior to yielding of steel), so
0.85
fb cAf
1 β= +
Af
c
s s
f fe
dc
c
dc
c
f
0.85
fb cAE
1 β=
0.003
+
AE
0.003
−ε
c
s
s
f
f
bi
(
)
(
)
2
46.24
c
=
313.2 10.19
c
+
100.08 11.8
c
26.69
c
2
46.24
c
+
439.97
c
4372.45
=
0
=
439.97
+
439.97
2
+× ×
4
46.24
4372.45
c
=
6.07 "
a
=
5.16"
2
×
46.24
0.003
(
)
ε= −= <ε =
dc
0.00204
0.00207
s
y
c
0.003
(
)
ε=
dc
−−ε=
0.00203
fe
f
bi
fd
c
4000
ε=
0.083
=
0.00406
fd
3
×
13900000
×
0.04
Thus, the brittle crushing failure is confirmed.
a
a
MMAf
=φ =φ −+φΨ
d
Af
d
u
n
ss
f
f fe
f
2
2
5.16
2
=
0.65
×
3.629,000
×
×
0.00204
×
10.19
+
0.65
×
0.85
×
2.4
5.16
2
×
13,900
×
0.00203
×
11.8
=
1053.62
+
345.01
=
1398.63 k-in.
So for a large amount of CFRP, the section is strengthened by only 1.3%. This
example is intended to show the ineffectiveness of this failure mode that is not
admissible unless the section is already heavily reinforced to start with. To reinforce
this idea even further, the following design example (Example 5.9) is presented.
Example 5.9: Design
For the section analyzed in Example 5.8, design for the required area of FRP A f
and determine the failure mode involved using the ACI 440.2R-08 approach if
M
=
1380.60
k
in
u
M
=
1518.66
k
in
u
(i.e., 10% strengthening level)
Use dh
f
==
12"
Search WWH ::




Custom Search