Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Descriptives
therapy
1
Statistic
Std. Error
GAFscore
Mean
61.00
4.050
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
49.76
72.24
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
61.00
60.00
82.000
9.055
50
72
22
18
.071
.913
-1.869
2.000
2
44.80
3.611
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
34.77
54.83
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
44.78
45.00
65.200
8.075
35
55
20
16
.052
.913
-1.557
2.000
3
70.40
.510
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
68.98
71.82
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
70.39
70.00
1.300
1.140
69
72
3
2
.405
.913
-.178
2.000
Figure 5.15
Descriptive statistics from
Explore
.
Our previous suspicion is confirmed by the SPSS
Tests of Normal-
ity
output in Figure 5.16. Both
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
and
Shapiro-
Wilk
tests were not statistically significant (
p
01) for each level of the
independent variable. This result indicates that the distribution of error
associated with the GAF scores across levels of therapy did not depart
significantly from normality.
>.
