Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
df
A
×
S
=
(
a
−
1)(
n
−
1)
=
(2
−
1)(6
−
1)
=
(1)(5)
=
5
df
B
×
S
=
(
b
−
1)(
n
−
1)
=
(3
−
1)(6
−
1)
=
(2)(5)
=
10
df
A
×
B
×
S
=
(
a
−
1)(
b
−
1)(
n
−
1)
=
(2
−
1)(3
−
1)(6
−
1)
=
(1)(2)(5)
=
10
df
T
=
(
a
)(
b
)(
n
)
−
1
=
(2)(3)(6)
−
1
=
36
−
1
=
35
.
11.6.3 CALCULATING MEAN SQUARES AND
F
RATIOS
Mean squares are calculated by dividing each sum of squares by its respec-
tive degrees of freedom. Note that we do not calculate a mean square total
value. You will recall from our earlier discussion that a two-factor within-
subjects design produces three
F
ratios. What is unique about this analysis
is that each
F
ratio requires a separate error term for the denominator to
control for the different sources of variability influencing the scores of the
dependentmeasureunderstudy.Thus,ourthree
F
ratios are formed with
the following error terms.
F
A
:
MS
A
×
S
,
F
B
:
MS
B
×
S
, and
F
A
×
B
:
MS
A
×
B
×
S
.
Thus,
MS
A
MS
A
×
S
=
F
A
=
1.76
(11.9)
MS
B
MS
B
×
S
=
78
.
70
F
B
=
=
52.82
(11.10)
1
.
49
MS
A
×
B
MS
A
×
B
×
S
=
8
.
53
F
A
×
B
=
33
=
25.85
.
(11.11)
0
.
11.6.4 EVALUATING THE
F
RATIOS
We test the null hypothesis for each of our three observed (calculated)
F
ratios by evaluating each
F
value with critical values of
F
(see Appendix C)
at the following degrees of freedom: (
df
effect
,
df
error
), at a particular alpha
level. Thus, our
F
observed for Factor
A
was
F
A
=
76 and is evaluated
with (1, 5) degrees of freedom. The critical value of
F
at these degrees
of freedom (with alpha set at .05) is 6.61. Since our
F
A
is less than the
critical value, we do not reject the null hypothesis, and conclude that type
of vehicle does not affect the error rate.
For the main effect of Factor
B
,our
F
B
was 52.82 and is evaluated
with (2, 10) degrees of freedom. The critical value of
F
is 4.10 at the .05
level. Since our
F
B
is greater than the critical value, we reject the null and
conclude that the amount of alcohol affects the error rate.
Lastly, we evaluate the interaction effect (
F
A
×
B
=
1
.
85) with (2, 10)
degrees of freedom. These happen to be the same degrees of freedom
we had with
F
B
;hence,werejectthenullhypothesisandconcludethat
25
.