Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
The model without faults exhibits the strong S - effect: the transverse impedance
Z observed over the central segment differs from the locally normal impedance Z n
by the distortion factor
S 1 S 1 .
=
2
=
Let
2
→∞ , f
0. In this model the faults are of infinitesimal resistivity.
Then A
=
0
,
D
=
0, whence
Z N
=−
i
o h
|
y
| ≥ v +
q
Z ( y )
(9
.
9)
Z N
=−
i
o h
|
y
| ≤ v
Here the S - effect is suppressed and the transverse impedance Z comes to
the normalcy: excess current arising in the inhomogeneous sediments is released
through the conductive faults.
Clearly the intensity of the S - effect depends on the fault resistivity. Consider
this mechanism from the physical point of view.
The impact of a thin fault crossing highly resistive lithosphere can be defined by
two integral parameters: by the resistance
ζ f = f h 2 q
R 2 q of the fault in the
=
ν S 1 of the sedimentary
central segment in the horizontal direction. Let us return to (9.7) and find asymp-
totics of coefficients A and D at q
1 ν h 1 =
vertical direction and by the resistance
ζ s =
2
2
0 and
2 →∞
. Using Taylor-series expansion
of exponential and hyperbolic functions, we write
o h 1
S 1
S 1
1
A
≈−
i
1) ,
S 1
S 1 +
1
P ( F
+
(9
.
10)
o h S 1
1
1
D
≈−
i
S 1
1 ,
P S 1
S 1 +
F
+
where
v
S 1 R 2 ,
ζ s
2
q
S 1 R 2 .
v
P
=
F
=
ζ f =
2 .Theyhavesim-
ple physical interpretation. We believe that vertical redistribution of excess current
includes two mechanisms: (1) slow percolation through the highly resistive litho-
sphere; the intensity of this mechanism is determined by parameter P (the greater is
P , the more intensive is the percolation), and (2) abrupt flow through the conductive
faults; the intensity of this mechanism is determined by parameter F (the greater
is F , the more intensive is the abrupt flow). In (9.10) these two mechanisms are
expressed separately.
These asymptotic formulae are valid for small q and great
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search