Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
2
2
2
1
e g ( | y |− v ) / f
n
˙
1
|
y
| ≥ v
cot h g
Z ( y )
+
f v
2
( y )
=
=
2
o
2
2
cos h g
f
1
n
¨
1
+
y
|
y
| ≤ v,
sin h g
cot h g
f v
+
f v
(7
.
76)
n are locally normal apparent resistivities in the side segments and
the central segment.
Once again we see that variations in the conductance S 1 of the upper layer may
dramatically distort the descending branches of the apparent-resistivity curves ( S-
effect) but leaves almost undistorted their ascending branches. Let
n and ¨
where ˙
o S 1 h 2 >> 1
o S 1 h 2 >> 1. Then in the S 1 -interval (within the ascending branch of the
-curves), we have
and
, whence
1
S 1
Z N =
|
y
| ≥ v
Z ( y )
1
S 1
Z N
=
|
y
| ≤ v
(7
.
77)
1
o ( S 1 ) 2
Z ( y )
n =
|
| ≥ v
˙
y
2
( y )
=
1
o ( S 1 ) 2
o
n =
¨
|
y
| ≤ v.
In this approximation, the transverse impedance and apparent resistivity do not
depart from their locally normal values.
Now pass on to the h- interval. Let
o S 1 h 2 << 1 and
o S 1 h 2 << 1. Then,
-curves, we have f
f
within the descending branch of the
1 and
1,
whence
S 1
S 1
1
Z N
e ( | y |− v ) / d
1
S 1
S 1
|
y
| ≥ v
cot h d
1
+
Z ( y )
(7
.
78)
S 1
S 1
1
1
sin h d
y
d
Z N
1
S 1
cos h
|
y
| ≤ v
cot h d
S 1 +
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search