Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
123456789 0 1 2 3 4
-30
arg 2
-45
-60
arg 1
-75
arg , deg
B
TV
90
α 1
60
30
α 2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314
observation sites
Fig. 3.2 Phases arg
2 of the principal values of the regional two-dimensional impedance
[ Z R ] and its principal directions
1 ,
arg
-shaped near-surface
resistive inclusion and a 2D deep regional conductive prism shown in Fig. 2.3; B - Bahr method,
TV - true value; T = 640 s
1 , 2 in a superimposition model with a
Now we would like to illustrate the potentialities of the Bahr method. Let us
return to the three-layered (3D+2D)-superimposition model with a local
-shaped
resistive inclusion in the sediments and a regional two-dimensional prismatic con-
ductor in the resistive lithosphere (Fig. 2.3). At T = 640 s we have ske
w
B < 0
.
1 and
30 . These conditions favour the local-regional decomposition. Figure 3.2
displays the phases
|| ≈
2 of the principal values of the regional
two-dimensional impedance [ Z R ] and its principal (transverse and longitudinal)
directions,
1 =
arg
1 , 2 =
arg
are
defined with an accuracy of 1-3 and 1-2 respectively. Figure 3.3 shows the chart
of the unit electric fields e (y) plotted by means of Bahr's method. We see here a
typical picture of currents flowing around a near-surface resistive inclusion.
1 and
2 , deduced by the Bahr method. We see that arg
and
x
y
Fig. 3.3 Chart of the unit
electric fields e ( y ) in a
superimposition model with a
-shaped near-surface
resistive inclusion and a 2D
deep regional conductive
prism shown in Fig. 2.3;
T = 640 s
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search