Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 1. Calibrated Radiocarbon Dates Used in This Study a
Depth (m)
Material/Location
Calculated Livermore 7/2002
Plus/Minus
Calibrated CalPal 7/2005
Plus/Minus
Core A
41
cone scale/charcoal lens
1460
60
1366
49
51
needle/clay lens
1920
40
1867
42
148
needle/below charcoal
2210
45
2231
67
212
needle/charcoal lens
4830
100
5540
123
292
wood
6330
80
7245
104
392
leaf
6350
80
7280
91
Core C
27
needle/above charcoal
1520
45
1420
62
55
wood/below charcoal
1915
35
1860
35
71
cone scale/charcoal
2200
40
2227
67
88
charred wood
2925
35
3072
67
125
needle/charcoal
4560
70
5211
127
145
rootlet/below clay
5455
40
6250
38
172
rootlet/below clay
5920
60
6746
67
197
rootlet/top detritus lens
6285
40
7214
39
208
rootlet/detritus lens
6540
40
7455
29
213
rootlet/bottom clay lens
6600
35
7500
47
216
rootlet/detritus lens
6750
80
7599
66
222
rootlet/bottom clay lens
6640
40
7523
40
232
seed husk/charcoal lens
5680
60
6474
70
240
wood/dark gyttja lens
6000
45
6826
57
252
forb/charcoal lens
6305
40
7233
36
265
needle/charcoal lens
6420
60
7346
54
272
forb/bottom clay lens
6840
110
7695
92
276
forb
6825
50
7658
37
276
forb (duplicate)
6805
50
7645
32
330
needle/top of unit
6845
40
7670
37
371
forb/bottom of unit
6930
70
7762
65
385
needle/silt lens
7030
110
7842
99
390
needle/brown gyttja lens
6910
130
7757
115
390
needle (duplicate)
7020
230
7868
207
395
needle/charcoal
7250
90
8066
85
404
forb/clay lens
7410
40
8246
57
Core C Dates Not Used
133
cone scale/outlier
1850
50
1787
59
266
needle/contaminated
5775
50
6572
62
279 cone scale/outlier modern date
294 needle/not needed 6540 35 7453 25
a Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dates were determined by the Lawrence Livermore Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
from plant macrofossils collected from Coburn Lake, California. AMS dates were transformed to calibrated dates cal years B.P. (present is
A.D. 1950) using the Cologne Radiocarbon, Calibration, and Paleoclimate Research Package (CalPal): Online quickcal2004 version 1.2
(B. Weninger et al., 2004, available at http://download.calpal.de/calpal-info/).
episodic rather than uniform, and (3) a coherent pattern of
sedimentation resulted from using the methods employed.
The two sets of deep core sediments were compared
with each other to confirm the dating and stratigraphy of the
primary set of deep core sediments that was to be used for
further analysis. The two sets of cores were cross-correlated
with each other using (1) the initial 24 14 C-AMS dates; (2)
additional AMS dates derived from the secondary set of deep
Search WWH ::




Custom Search