Interplay Between Spindle Architecture and Function - International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology - page 119

Brugues, J., et al., 2012. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spin-
dles. Cell 149, 554-564.
Budde, P.P., et al., 2001. Regulation of Op18 during spindle assembly in Xenopus egg
extracts. J. Cell Biol. 153, 149-158.
Burbank, K.S., et al., 2007. Slide-and-cluster models for spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 17,
1373-1383.
Burrack, L.S., Berman, J., 2012a. Flexibility of centromere and kinetochore structures.
Trends Genet. 28, 204-212.
Burrack, L.S., Berman, J., 2012b. Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of
centromeres. Chromosome Res. 20, 607-619.
Cai, S., et al., 2009. Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat. Cell
Biol. 11, 832-838.
Cameron, L.A., et al., 2006. Kinesin 5-independent poleward flux of kinetochore microtu-
bules in PtK1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 173, 173-179.
Cassimeris, L., 2002. The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers. Curr.
Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 18-24.
Castoldi, M., Vernos, I., 2006. Chromokinesin Xklp1 contributes to the regulation of
microtubule density and organization during spindle assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 17,
1451-1460.
Chang, P., et al., 2004. Poly(ADP-ribose) is required for spindle assembly and structure.
Nature 432, 645-649.
Chang, H., et al., 2012. The TPX2 gene is a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for
cervical cancer. Oncol. Rep. 27, 1353-1359.
Chen, G., et al., 2012. Whole chromosome aneuploidy: big mutations drive adaptation by
phenotypic leap. Bioessays 34, 893-900.
Chretien, D., et al., 1992. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within
individual microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 117, 1031-1040.
Cole, D.G., et al., 1994. A “slow” homotetrameric kinesin-related motor protein purified
from Drosophila embryos. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22913-22916.
Colombie, N., et al., 2008. Dual roles of Incenp crucial to the assembly of the acentrosomal
metaphase spindle in female meiosis. Development 135, 3239-3246.
Compton, D.A., 1998. Focusing on spindle poles. J. Cell Sci. 111 (Pt. 11), 1477-1481.
De Souza, C.P., Osmani, S.A., 2007. Mitosis, not just open or closed. Eukaryot. Cell 6,
1521-1527.
Desai, A., Mitchison, T.J., 1997. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell
Dev. Biol. 13, 83-117.
Diaz-Valencia, J.D., et al., 2011. Drosophila katanin-60 depolymerizes and severs at micro-
tubule defects. Biophys. J. 100, 2440-2449.
Ding, R., et al., 1993. Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles
from the yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Biol. 120, 141-151.
Ding, Y., et al., 2009. Chromator is required for proper microtubule spindle formation and
mitosis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 334, 253-263.
Downing, K.H., Nogales, E., 1998. Tubulin and microtubule structure. Curr. Opin. Cell
Biol. 10, 16-22.
Drummond, D.R., 2011. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by kinesins. Semin. Cell Dev.
Biol. 22, 927-934.
Endow, S.A., et al., 1994. Mutants of the Drosophila ncd microtubule motor protein cause
centrosomal and spindle pole defects in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 107 (Pt. 4), 859-867.
Frost, A., et al., 2012. Functional repurposing revealed by comparing S. pombe and S.
cerevisiae genetic interactions. Cell 149, 1339-1352.