Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
1.11 CONCLUDING REMARKS
In the decade since the DOS concept was introduced, the field has matured consider-
ably, with numerous sophisticated approaches to the generation of molecular diversity
being developed. Emphasis on the generation of scaffold diversity has become inte-
gral to the field, as there is an overriding, and justified, opinion that the incorporation
of this type of diversity into a compound collection is most important in terms of
producing a functionally (biologically) diverse library. As such, many modern exam-
ples focus on the production of compound collections containing a high degree of
three-dimensional scaffold and shape diversity. As the examples highlighted in this
chapter show, the DOS approach has been applied toward the synthesis of a range of
compound collections with varying molecular parameters. In the majority of cases,
the libraries produced are intended to span known drug-like chemical space; however,
as the later examples in this chapter show, the ideas can also be applied effectively to
the synthesis of other structural classes, such as low-molecular-weight fragments or
larger macrocyclic compounds.
REFERENCES
1. S. L. Schreiber, Science 2000 , 287 , 1964-1969.
2. D. R. Spring, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003 , 1 , 3867-3870.
3. B. R. Stockwell, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2000 , 1 , 116-125.
4. S. L. Schreiber, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005 , 1 , 64-66.
5. M. D. Burke, S. L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004 , 43 , 46-58.
6. D. S. Tan, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005 , 1 , 74-84.
7. W. R. J. D. Galloway, A. Bender, M. Welch, D. R. Spring, Chem. Commun. 2009 , 2446-
2462.
8. D. R. Spring, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005 , 34 , 472-482.
9. C. J. O'Connor, L. Laraia, D. R. Spring, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011 , 40 , 4332-4345.
10. W. P. Walters, M. Namchuk, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003 , 2 , 259-266.
11. W. H. Sauer, M. K. Schwarz, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003 , 43 , 987-1003.
12. W. R. J. D. Galloway, D. R. Spring, Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 2009 , 4 , 467-472.
13. W. R. J. D. Galloway, A. Isidro-Llobet, D. R. Spring, Nat. Commun. 2011 , 1 , 80.
14. C. Lipinski, A. Hopkins, Nature 2004 , 432 , 855-861.
15. D. J. Newman, G. M. Cragg, J. Nat. Prod. 2007 , 70 , 461-477.
16. A. L. Harvey, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007 , 11 , 480-484.
17. J. W.-H. Li, J. C. Vederas, Science 2009 , 325 , 161-165.
18. M. S. Butler, Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005 , 22 , 162-195.
19. R. J. Spandl, A. Bender, D. R. Spring, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008 , 6 , 1149-1158.
20. D. S. Tan, M. A. Foley, M. D. Shair, S. L. Schreiber, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998 , 120 ,
8565-8566.
21. S. Borman, Chem. Eng. News 2004 , 82 , 32-40.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search