Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
MOCVD
MBE
Flexibility
Most compounds and alloys
Difficulty with phosphorus and Alloys 
with two column V elements
Purity
GaAs
µ 77  139,000
µ 77  125,000
InGaAs
µ 300  11,800
µ 300  8,800
InP
µ 77  58,900
µ 77  34,000
Photoluminescence
AlGaAs
Comparable to LPE
Less than LPE
Others
Comparable to LPE
Comparable to LPE
Uniformity
Doping
2.5%
2.5%
Thickness
2.5%
1.0%
Composition
0.005
0.005
Interfaces
AlGaAs/GaAs
1-2 Monolayer
1 Monolayer
InAlAs/InGaAs
<50 A
InP/InGaAs
1 Monolayer
Defect density
Dislocation Density
1-3 × 10 3 /cm 2  oval defects
FIGURE 5.28
MOCVD versus MBE—Comparison of Material Properties. (From Dapkus, P.D., J. Crystal
Growth , 68, 345-355, 1984.) [94]
MOCVD
MBE
Growth rate and/or 
composition
Source temperature (±0.25°C)
Source temperature (±0.4°C)
Flow rates (±1%)
Substrate temperature (±5°C)
Substrate temperature (±5°C)
Doping
Flow rates
Source temperature
Substrate temperature
Substrate temperature
Purity
Source purity 
Vacuum materials
Growth temperature
Source purity
Interface abruptness
Reactor design, flow rates, substrate
Shutter speed
Rotation speed
Substrate temperature
System cost
$200-$400 K
$700-$1000 K
Production throughput
≤900 cm 2 /run
≤20 cm 2 /run
Safety considerations
Poisonous materials
Toxic wastes
Pyrophoric materials
Toxic wastes
FIGURE 5.29
MOCVD versus MBE—Comparison of parameter controls and system cost. (From Dapkus,
P.D., J. Crystal Growth , 68, 345-355, 1984.) [94]
Search WWH ::




Custom Search