Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
The remainder of the chapter can be summarised as follows.
Sects. 2
and
3
analyse respectively the effects of delay and discreteness on blow-up behaviour
(reflecting upregulation due to a positive feedback loop) in minimal models, in
each case investigating both linear and nonlinear (cooperative) feedback.
Sect. 4
explores related effects by further characterising a preexisting [
7
,
9
] model for
quorum sensing governed by the so-called agr operon. Finally,
Sect. 5
briefly
discusses some of the implications of the results.
2 Spatio-Temporal Blow-Up Phenomena:
The Effects of Delays
The context for the current analysis is provided by two very widely studied PDE
models. Firstly, the simplest (linear) reaction-diffusion model
1
takes the form
2
u
ox
2
ð
x
;
t
Þþ
u
ð
x
;
t
Þ1
\x\
þ1;
o
u
ot
ð
x
;
t
Þ¼
o
ð
1
Þ
wherein the linear source term embodies the simplest class of positive-feedback
mechanism, leading (for finite-mass initial data) to infinite-time blow up
2
in the
form
M
2
ð
pt
Þ
2
e
t
x
2
=
4t
x
¼
O
ð
t
2
Þ
u
as
t
!þ1;
2
ð
pt
Þ
2
X
x
e
t
x
2
=
4t
ð
2
Þ
1
u
as
t
!þ1;
x
¼
O
ð
t
Þ;
t
for some constant M and arbitrary function X that satisfies X
ð
0
Þ¼
M. Secondly,
ot
ð
x
;
t
Þ¼
o
2
u
o
u
ox
2
ð
x
;
t
Þþ
u
2
ð
x
;
t
Þ1
\x\
þ1
ð
3
Þ
is an archetypal model for nonlinear positive feedback and one that has spawned
an extensive literature concerning its finite time blow up, an effect already illus-
trated by its spatial homogeneous solution
u
ð
t
Þ¼
1
t
c
t
ð
4
Þ
for constant t
c
[ 0; the diffusion term in (
3
) turns out to have a rather limited
influence in mitigating such blow up, the competition between autoinduction
1
We for the most part adopt dimensionless forms containing the minimal numbers of parameters
in this section and the next.
2
Throughout we associate such blow up with upregulation (e.g. quorum sensing).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search