Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
The remainder of the chapter can be summarised as follows. Sects. 2 and 3
analyse respectively the effects of delay and discreteness on blow-up behaviour
(reflecting upregulation due to a positive feedback loop) in minimal models, in
each case investigating both linear and nonlinear (cooperative) feedback. Sect. 4
explores related effects by further characterising a preexisting [ 7 , 9 ] model for
quorum sensing governed by the so-called agr operon. Finally, Sect. 5 briefly
discusses some of the implications of the results.
2 Spatio-Temporal Blow-Up Phenomena:
The Effects of Delays
The context for the current analysis is provided by two very widely studied PDE
models. Firstly, the simplest (linear) reaction-diffusion model 1
takes the form
2 u
ox 2 ð x ; t Þþ u ð x ; t Þ1 \x\ þ1;
o u
ot ð x ; t Þ¼ o
ð 1 Þ
wherein the linear source term embodies the simplest class of positive-feedback
mechanism, leading (for finite-mass initial data) to infinite-time blow up 2
in the
form
M
2 ð pt Þ 2 e t x 2 = 4t
x ¼ O ð t 2 Þ
u
as
t !þ1;
2 ð pt Þ 2 X x
e t x 2 = 4t
ð 2 Þ
1
u
as
t !þ1;
x ¼ O ð t Þ;
t
for some constant M and arbitrary function X that satisfies X ð 0 Þ¼ M. Secondly,
ot ð x ; t Þ¼ o 2 u
o u
ox 2 ð x ; t Þþ u 2 ð x ; t Þ1 \x\ þ1
ð 3 Þ
is an archetypal model for nonlinear positive feedback and one that has spawned
an extensive literature concerning its finite time blow up, an effect already illus-
trated by its spatial homogeneous solution
u ð t Þ¼ 1
t c t
ð 4 Þ
for constant t c [ 0; the diffusion term in ( 3 ) turns out to have a rather limited
influence in mitigating such blow up, the competition between autoinduction
1 We for the most part adopt dimensionless forms containing the minimal numbers of parameters
in this section and the next.
2
Throughout we associate such blow up with upregulation (e.g. quorum sensing).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search