Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
where O 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 were the four parts. Further analysis showed that three of the parts functioned in the same
way, i.e., α and β functions were identical). These channel parts were each called m and the remaining
part was called h . Their model of the Sodium current was described by
g Na m 3 h(V m )
I Na =
[
V m
E Na ]
(3.8)
dm
dt =
α m ( 1
m)
β m m
(3.9)
dh
dt =
α h ( 1
h)
β h h
(3.10)
where m and h are known as gating variable because they control how ions are gated through the channel.
The only difference between the h and m variables is that the functions of α and β are different.
Using their experimental data and some curve fitting, Hodgkin Huxley found the following fits
for the α 's an β 's:
v m
e ( 25 v m )/ 10
25
α m =
0 . 1
(3.11)
1
4 e v m / 18
βm
=
(3.12)
0 . 07 e v m / 20
α h =
(3.13)
1
e ( 30 v m )/ 10
β h =
(3.14)
+
1
is scaled by the resting potential such that v m = V m V rest
where v m
.
m
3.1.5 The PotassiumCurrent
The Potassium current may be assumed to be of the nonlinear form
I K =
[
V m
E K ]
g K O(V m )
.
(3.15)
Recall, however, that the first assumption was that each current was independent of the other currents
present. So, simply performing the voltage clamp as described above would yield data on I K +
I Na .To
separate the two currents, Hodgkin and Huxley used tetrodotoxin (TTX), a Sodium channel blocker, to
isolate I K . They then performed the same experiment without TTX to yield I K +
I Na and by simple
subtraction they isolated I Na . Using this two-step procedure, they found that O(V m ) for I K was the
product of four gating variables that were all identical:
I K = g K n 4
[ V m E K ]
(3.16)
dn
dt =
α n ( 1
n)
β n n.
(3.17)
Experimental data for the n gating variable was fit to the following α and β functions:
v m
e ( 10 v m )/ 10
10
α n =
0 . 01
(3.18)
1
0 . 125 e v m / 80 .
β n =
(3.19)
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search