Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
found under which Nz 1 <
Nz 2 if z 1 <
z 2 . To do this the following inequality
should be satisfied:
Nz 1
Nz 2 =
A 1 z 1
A 2 z 2
A 1 z 1
A 2 z 2
=
/ 12
x z 1
z 1 +
X 2
σ
=
/ 12
x z 2 <
1
,
(12.26)
z 2
+
X 2
σ
where A 1 and A 2 correspond to z
=
z 1 and z
=
z 2 . It follows from Equation
(12.26) that
X 2
12
z 1 z 2 >
x .
(12.27)
σ
The inequality obtained can be applied to find the value of z that provides the
minimum of criterion Nz. This procedure can be explained by an example.
Example 12.2
Let X
=
10. Substituting this value into the inequality (12.27) yields
x
8 3 .
z 1 z 2 >
(12.28)
Let z 1 =
1. Then it follows from expression (12.28) that it is better to use one
threshold level than z
9. At the same time, it is better to use from two to eight
levels than one. Now let z 1 =
2. In this case it is better to use two threshold levels
than z
5. On the other hand, application of two threshold levels is less desirable
than z
4, it is found
that, under the given conditions, the best solution minimizing the criterion Nz is
z
=
3or z
=
4. By comparing the cases when z
=
3 and z
=
=
3. The relationship of z versus the ratio
σ
/
X , minimizing this criterion, is
x
shown in Figure 12.1.
12.2.3 Minimizing Bit Flow
Criterion Nn
Minimizing this criterion allows the optimal number of quantization threshold
levels to be determined, which guarantees that the estimate ˆ
x will be obtained
with the required accuracy by processing the minimum bits. Since values of z
and n are connected by z
μ
2 n
1, optimization can be carried out in the same
way as in the previous case. If the minimum of N is reached by processing
uncorrelated signal samples, as in the case of optimizing with regard to crite-
rion Nz , the minimum of criterion Nn can be determined on the basis of the
=
Search WWH ::




Custom Search