Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
orthopaedic implants, SAMPE Quart. (1990)
10
e
14.
[27] M. Spector, E.J. Cheal, R. Jamison, S. Alter,
N. Madsen, L. Strait, et al., Composite mate-
rials for hip replacement prostheses, 22nd
International SAMPE Technical Conference
22 (1990) 1119
e
1130.
[28] R. Huiskes, H. Weinans, B. van Rietbergen,
The relationship between stress shielding and
bone resorption around total hip stems and the
effects of flexible materials, Clin. Orthop.
Relat. Res. 274 (1992) 124
e
134.
[29] T.M. Wright, S.B. Goodman, Implant Wear,
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons,
Rosemont, IL, 2001.
[30] T.M. Turner, D.R. Sumner, R.M. Urban,
R. Igloria, J.O. Galante, Maintenance of
proximal cortical bone with use of a less stiff
femoral component in hemiarthroplasty of
the hip without cement. An investigation in
a canine model at six months and two years,
J. Bone
[36] A. Shirazi-Adl, M. Dammak, G. Paiement,
Experimental determination of friction charac-
teristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated
metal interface in cementless implants, J.
Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (2) (1993) 167
e
175.
[37] A.H. Glassman, Composite femoral stem for
total hip arthroplasty, Curr. Orthop. Practice 19
(2) (2008) 110
e
113.
[38] M.A. Hartzband, A.H. Glassman, V.M. Goldberg,
L.R. Jordan, R.D. Crowninshield, K.B. Fricka,
et al., Survivorship of a low-stiffness exten-
sively porous-coated femoral stem at 10 years,
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468 (2)
(2010)
433
e
440.
[39] A.W. Turner, R.M. Gillies, R. Sekel, P. Morris,
W. Bruce, W.R. Walsh, Computational bone
remodelling simulations and comparisons with
DEXA results, J. Orthop. Res. 23 (4) (2005)
705
e
712.
[40] J. Karrholm, R. Razaznejad, Fixation and bone
remodeling around a low stiffness stem in
revision surgery, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 466
(2) (2008) 380
e
388.
[41] H. Brinkerhuff, Personal communication, 2007
January.
[42] G.R. Maharaj, R.D. Jamison, Creep testing of
a composite material human hip prosthesis, in:
R.D. Jamison, L.N. Gilbertson (Eds.), STP 1178:
CompositeMaterials for Implant Applications in
the Human Body: Characterization and Testing,
ASTM, Philadelphia, 1993, pp. 86
e
97.
[43] G.R. Maharaj, R.D. Jamison, Intraoperative
impact: characterization and laboratory simula-
tion on composite hip prostheses, in:
R.D. Jamison, L.N. Gilbertson (Eds.), STP
1178: Composite Materials for Implant Appli-
cations in the Human Body: Characterization
and Testing, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1993, pp.
98
e
108.
[44] H. Yildiz, F. Chang, S. Goodman, Composite
hip prosthesis design.
Joint
Surg.
79
(9)
(1997)
1381
e
1390.
[31] E.J. Harvey, J.D. Bobyn, M. Tanzer,
G.J. Stackpool, J.J. Krygier, S.A. Hacking,
Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on
bone remodeling and fixation of the stem in
a canine total hip arthroplasty model without
cement, J. Bone Joint Surg. 81 (1) (1999)
93
e
107.
[32] A.H. Glassman, R.D. Crowninshield,
R. Schenck, P. Herberts, A low stiffness
composite biologically fixed prosthesis, Clin.
Orthop. Relat. Res. 393 (2001) 128
e
136.
[33] J. Karrholm, C. Anderberg, F. Snorrason,
J. Thanner, N. Langeland, H. Malchau, et al.,
Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced
stiffness. A randomized study with use of
radiostereometry and bone densitometry, J.
Bone Joint Surg. 84-A (9) (2002) 1651
e
1658.
[34] S. Akhavan, M.M. Matthiesen, L. Schulte,
T. Penoyar, M.J. Kraay, C.M. Rimnac, et al.,
Clinical and histologic results related to a low-
modulus composite total hip replacement
stem, J. Bone Joint Surg. 88 (6)
II. Simulation,
J.
Biomed. Mater. Res. 39 (1996) 102
e
119.
[45] H. Yildiz, S. Ha, F. Chang, Composite hip
prosthesis design. I. Analysis, J. Biomed.
Mater. Res. 39 (1996) 92
e
101.
[46] S. Srinivasan, J.R. de Andrade, S.B. Biggers,
R.A. Latour, Structural response and relative
strength of a laminated composite hip pros-
thesis: effects of functional activity, Biomate-
rials 21 (19) (2000) 1929
e
1940.
(2006)
1308
e
1314.
[35] M. Hawkins. Design and development of the
Epoch stem. MD&M Meeting in Minneapolis,
MN, October 12, 2010. Available from:
http://
www.medicalpeek.org/pub_reports/view/113
.
