Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
[86] ASTM F1717-10, Standard test methods for
spinal implant constructs in a vertebrectomy
model, ASTM International, West Con-
shohocken, PA, 2010.
www.astm.org
, 2010.
[87] R. Siskey, J. Day, S.M. Kurtz, Validation of
a test method for evaluating the fatigue
performance of PEEK spinal fusion rod
systems, Transactions of the 56th Orthopedic
Research Society 35 (2010) 0274.
[88] M. Pasciak, J. Grzywocz, A. Nobis, A. Pala,
T. Wadek, PEEK plastic rods versus titanium
“stiff” rods in transpedicular lumbar stabiliza-
tion. Clinical comparison of short term results,
Transactions of Eurospine 2009 (2009) P39.
[89] T.M. Grupp, H.J. Meisel, J.A. Cotton,
J. Schwiesau, B. Fritz, W. Blomer, et al.,
Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral
disc arthroplasty, Biomaterials 31 (3) (2009)
523
e
531.
[90] Q.B. Bao, M. Songer, K. Pimenta, D. Werner,
A. Reyes-Sanchez, M. Balsano, et al., NUBAC
intradiscal arthroplasty: preclinical studies and
preliminary safety and efficacy evaluations,
SAS J. 1 (2007) 36
e
45.
[91] D. Coric, M. Songer, H. Yuan, L. Pimenta,
A. Reyes-Sanchez, D. Werner, et al., Up to
2-year follow-up results of a novel PEEK-on-
PEEK disc arthroplasty: A prospective world-
wide multicenter clinical study, Transactions
of the 9th Annual Symposium for the Inter-
national Society for the Advance of Spine
Surgery (SAS) (2009).
[92] T. Brown, Q. Bao, Compressive load sensi-
tivity on the biotribological properties of
NUBAC, Transactions of the 9th Annual
Symposium for the International Society for
the Advance of Spine Surgery (SAS) (2009).
[93] M. Wimmer, T. Schwenke, T. Brown,
T. Kilpela, Q. Bao, The effect of accelerated
aging on the wear of PEEK for use in disc
arthroplasty, Transactions of the 54th Ortho-
pedic Research Society 54 (2008) 1922.
[94] T. Brown, Q. Bao, T. Kilpela, T. Schwenke,
M. Wimmer, A comprehensive wear assess-
ment of PEEK-OPTIMA for disc arthroplasty
applications, Transactions
[95] T. Schwenke, T. Brown, Q. Bao, T. Kilpela,
M. Wimmer, Wear assessment of a self mating
polymer for nucleus replacement devices,
Transactions of the 53rd Orthopedic Research
Society 53 (2007) 1125.
[96] T. Brown, Q. Bao, T. Kilpela, A wear assess-
ment of NUBAC under a cross shear motion
profile, Transactions of the 7th Annual SAS
Global Symposium on Motion Preservation
Technology (2007).
[97] H. Yuan, D. Coric, P. Yuan, D. Zou, H. Ma,
H. Yang, et al., Early clinical experience of
NuNec, a novel PEEK-on-PEEK artificial
cervical disc, Transactions of the 9th Annual
Symposium for the International Society for
the Advance of Spine Surgery (SAS) (2009).
[98] T. Brown, Q. Bao, N. Hallab, Biotribology
assessment of NUNEC, a PEEK on PEEK
cervical disc replacement according to ISO
and ASTM recommendations, Transactions of
the 9th Annual Symposium for the Interna-
tional Society for the Advance of Spine
Surgery (SAS) (2009).
[99] S.C. Scholes, A. Unsworth, The wear perfor-
mance of PEEK-OPTIMA based self-mating
couples, Wear
(2009).
doi:10.1016/
j.wear.2009.08.023.
[100] H. Austin, M. Powell, J. Medley, D. Langohr,
Exploring the wear of a PEEK all-polymer
articulation for spinal applications, Trans-
actions of the Society for Biomaterials (2009).
[101] A.P. Dooris, P.J. Ares, S.M. Gabriel,
H.A. Serhan, Wear characterization of an
artificial disc using ASTM guidelines, Trans-
actions of the 51st Orthopedic Research
Society (2005) 51.
[102] P.V. Mummaneni, R.W. Haid, The future in
the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion
and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the
Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the
Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004, J.
Neurosurg. (1) (2004) 155
e
159.
[103] W. Nechtow, M. Hinter, M. Bushelow,
C. Caddick, IVD replacement mechanical
performance depends strongly on input
parameters, Transactions of the 52nd Ortho-
pedic Research Society 52 (2006) 118.
of
the World
Biomaterials Congress (2008).
