Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
73. Kunkel MT, Toker A, Tsien RY, Newton AC. Calcium-dependent regulation of pro-
tein kinase D revealed by a genetically encoded kinase activity reporter.
J Biol Chem
2007;
282
:6733-42.
74. Mac˚ rek L, Lindqvist A, Lim D, Lampson MA, Klompmaker R, Freire R, et al.
Polo-like kinase-1 is activated by aurora A to promote checkpoint recovery.
Nature
2008;
455
:119-24.
75. Tomida T, Takekawa M, O'Grady P, Saito H. Stimulus-specific distinctions in
spatial and temporal dynamics of stress-activated protein kinase kinase kinases
revealed by a fluorescence resonance energy transfer biosensor.
MolCe lBiol
2009;
29
:6117-27.
76. Wang Y, Botvinick EL, Zhao Y, Berns MW, Usami S, Tsien RY, et al. Visualizing the
mechanical activation of Src.
Nature
2005;
434
:1040-5.
77. Hitosugi T, Sasaki K, SatoM, SuzukiY,UmezawaY. Epidermal growth factor directs sex-
specific steroid signaling through Src activation.
JBiolChem
2007;
282
:10697-706.
78. Xiang X, Sun J, Wu J, He HT, Wang Y, Zhu C. A FRET-based biosensor for imaging
Syk activities in living cells.
Cell Mol Bioeng
2011;
4
:670-7.
79. Randriamampita C, Mouchacca P, Malissen B, Marguet D, Trautmann A,
Lellouch AC. Dependent FRET based biosensor reveals kinase activity at both the im-
munological synapse and the antisynapse.
PLoS One
2008;
3
:e1521.
80. Smith JA, et al. Identification of an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) docking
site in ribosomal S6 kinase, a sequence critical for activation by ERK in vivo.
J Biol
Chem
1999;
274
:2893-8.
81. Holland PM, Cooper JA. Protein modification: docking sites for kinases.
Curr Biol
1999;
9
:R329-R331.
82. Fernandes N, et al. Use of docking peptides to design modular substrates with high ef-
ficiency for mitogen-activated protein kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase.
ACS
Chem Biol
2007;
2
:665-73.
83. Yaffe MB, Elia AE. Phosphoserine/threonine-binding domains.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2001;
13
:131-8.
84. Yaffe MB. Phosphotyrosine-binding domains in signal transduction.
Nat Rev Mol Cell
Biol
2002;
3
:177-86.
85. Seet BT, Dikic I, Zhou MM, Pawson T. Reading protein modifications with interac-
tion domains.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2006;
7
:473-83.
86. Pawson T, Kofler M. Kinome signaling through regulated protein-protein interactions
in normal and cancer cells.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2009;
21
:147-53.
87. Durocher D, et al. The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding spec-
ificity and implications
for phospho-dependent
signaling mechanisms.
Mol Cell
2000;
6
:1169-82.
88. Lu PJ, et al. Function of WWdomains as phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-binding
modules.
Science
1999;
283
:1325-8.
89. Lowery DM, Mohammad DH, Elia AE, Yaffe MB. The Polo-box domain: a molecular
integrator of mitotic kinase cascades and Polo-like kinase function.
Cell Cycle
2004;
3
:128-31.
90. Ibraheem A, et al. A bacteria colony-based screen for optimal linker combinations in
genetically encoded biosensors.
BMC Biotechnol
2011;
11
:105.
91. Piljic A, et al. Rapid development of genetically encoded FRET reporters.
ACS Chem
Biol
2011;
6
:685-91.
92. Komatsu N, Aoki K, Yamada M, Yukinaga H, Fujita Y, Kamioka Y, et al. Develop-
ment of an optimized backbone of FRET biosensors for kinases and GTPases.
Mol Biol
Cell
2011;
22
:4647-56.
93. Nguyen AW, Daugherty PS. Evolutionary optimization of fluorescent proteins for
intracellular FRET.
Nat Biotechnol
2005;
23
:355-60.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search