Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
coefficients and of the signal poles. This method can be slightly changed in the case
of
p
non-damped real sinusoids to force the estimated poles to be of unit module:
2
2
a
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
1
(
)
( )
(
)
⎡
xNp
*
−+
1
xN
*
⎤
⎡
xNp
*
− ⎤
⎢ ⎥
a
⎢
⎥
p
⎢
⎥
−
1
⎢ ⎥
2
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
⎢ ⎥
a
()
( )
()
()
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
x
*1
x
*
p
x
* 0
p
⎢ ⎥
+
min
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
[6.30]
2
⎢ ⎥
(
)
( )
xp
−
1
x
0
xp
a
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
a
n
⎢ ⎥
p
⎢
⎥
−
1
⎢
⎥
⎢ ⎥
2
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
⎢ ⎥
(
)
(
)
()
xN
−
1
xN p
−
xN
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
⎣
⎦
⎣
⎦
⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢
⎣ ⎦
a
1
1
We speak then of the
harmonic
Prony
method
.
Other estimation methods of the
AR
parameters
,
implementing the correlation, can be used:
LSYW
and
LSMYW
,
for
example.
Once the poles are estimated
()
ˆ
n
z
, the complex amplitudes are obtained by
solving the Vandermonde system:
1
1
1
⎡
⎤
()
()
()
⎡
x
0
⎤
⎢
⎥
ˆ
z
z
ˆ
z
ˆ
⎢
⎥
⎢
1
2
p
⎥
⎡⎤
B
x
1
1
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
⎢⎥
2
2
2
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
⎢
⎥
z
z
z
≈
x
2
⎢
2
p
⎥
⎢⎥
1
[6.31]
⎢
⎥
⎢⎥
⎢
⎥
B
⎢
⎥
⎣⎦
p
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
(
)
xM
−
1
MM
−
1
−
1
M
p
−
1
⎢
⎥
z
ˆ
ˆ
z
ˆ
z
⎣
⎦
⎣
2
⎦
1
ˆ
VB
≈
x
Solutions in the least-squares sense and in the total least-squares sense can be
envisaged. It was shown in [DUC 97] that the total least-squares solution is less
efficient in terms of bias than that of the classic least-squares. On the other hand, the
number of equations
M
of the Vandermonde system can be chosen in an optimal
manner, as detailed in [DUC 95].
Search WWH ::
Custom Search