Java Reference
In-Depth Information
4.
N. Blum, “On the Single-Operation Worst-Case Time Complexity of the
Disjoint Set Union Problem,”
SIAM Journal on Computing
15
(1986),
1021-1024.
5.
B. Bollobas and I. Simon, “Probabilistic Analysis of Disjoint Set Union
Algorithms,”
SIAM Journal on Computing
22
(1993), 1053-1086.
6.
J. Doyle and R. L. Rivest, “Linear Expected Time of a Simple Union Find
Algorithm,”
Information Processing Letters
5
(1976), 146-148.
7.
H. N. Gabow and R. E. Tarjan, “A Linear-Time Algorithm for a Special
Case of Disjoint Set Union,”
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
30
(1985), 209-221.
8.
B. A. Galler and M. J. Fischer, “An Improved Equivalence Algorithm,”
Communications of the ACM
7
(1964), 301-303.
9.
J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman, “Set Merging Algorithms,”
SIAM Jour-
nal on Computing
2
(1973), 294-303.
10.
D. E. Knuth and A. Schonage, “The Expected Linearity of a Simple
Equivalence Algorithm,”
Theoretical Computer Science
6
(1978),
281-315.
11.
J. B. Kruskal, Jr., “On the Shortest Spanning Subtree of a Graph and the
Traveling Salesman Problem,”
Proceedings of the American Mathemati-
cal Society
7
(1956), 48-50.
12.
R. C. Prim, “Shortest Connection Networks and Some Generalizations,”
Bell System Technical Journal
36
(1957), 1389-1401.
13.
R. E. Tarjan, “Efficiency of a Good but Not Linear Set Union Algorithm,”
Journal of the ACM
22
(1975), 215-225.
14.
R. E. Tarjan, “A Class of Algorithms Which Require Nonlinear Time to
Maintain Disjoint Sets,”
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
18
(1979), 110-127.
15.
R. E. Tarjan, “Applications of Path Compression on Balanced Trees,”
Journal of the ACM
26
(1979), 690-715.
16.
R. E. Tarjan and J. van Leeuwen, “Worst Case Analysis of Set Union
Algorithms,”
Journal of the ACM
31
(1984), 245-281.
A. C. Yao, “On the Average Behavior of Set Merging Algorithms,”
Pro-
ceedings of the Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Compu-
tation
(1976), 192-195.
17.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search