Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
TableĀ 8.9 Summary of the Effects of the Cultivation of Bt Crops or Amendment with Bt Protein on Selected Nontarget Lepidopteran and Aquatic
Insect Larvae (continued)
Species/
classification
Bt crop plant/
experimental variable
Organism(s)
Study location
Protein
Effect on organism(s)
Source
Decomposition rate,
aquatic invertebrate
abundance, and
community
composition
10 different
invertebrate
taxa
Field
Bt and non- Bt maize
tissue in litterbags in
9 streams
Cry1Ab
Cry1Ab +
Cry3Bb1
Minimal effects; most
differences due to
site-to-site variation
and difference in
agricultural practices
Swan et al.
(2009)
Aquatic invertebrate
abundance, diversity,
biomass, and
functional structure
Trichopteran
Amphipod
Snail
Natural
populations
in the field
Laboratory
Field
Laboratory feeding
trials
Benthic cores and
litterbags in 12
streams adjacent to Bt
or non- Bt maize fields
Cry protein
not
specified;
Bt maize
lines
Crow4635
and
Agventure
Lepidostoma liba grew
slower when fed Bt
maize in the lab
No difference in
abundance or
diversity between Bt
and non- Bt fields
Chambers et
al. (2010)
Aquatic invertebrates
(sedge, caddis fly,
crane fly, and an
aquatic isopod)
Lepidostoma
spp.,
Pycnopsyche
cf.
scabripennis,
Tipula
(Nippotipula )
cf.
abdominalis,
Caecidotia
communis
Laboratory
Fed leaves of Bt or
non- Bt maize
Cry1Ab
Cry1Ab +
Cry3Bb1
Bt maize negatively
affected growth and
survivorship of crane
fly and C. communis;
effects were more due
to differences in plant
tissue content than
Cry protein
Jensen et al.
(2010)
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search