Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Nelasco, S., Arputtharaj, A. N., & Alwinson, E. G. (2007).
ELearning for Higher Studies of India.
Special Issue of
the International Journal of the Computer
.
The Internet
and Management
,
15
, 161-167.
Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Em-
bodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context
in mathematics education.
Educational Studies in Math-
ematics
,
39
(1-3), 45-65. doi:10.1023/A:1003759711966
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of
accuracy of feeling-of knowing predictions.
Psychologi-
cal Bulletin
,
95
, 109-133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. (2007). A student-centered ap-
proach to improving course quality using quality func-
tion deployment.
International Journal of Engineering
Education
,
23
(5), 916-928.
Nemirovsky, R., & Monk, S. (2000). “If you look at
it the other way…”: An exploration into the nature of
symbolizing . In Cobb, P. (Eds.),
Symbolizing and com-
municating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on
Discourse, Tools, and Instrumental Design
(pp. 177-221).
New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Olivier, B. A. (2003). Learning content interoperability
standards . In Littlejohn, A. (Ed.),
Reusing Online Re-
sources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning. London:
Kogan Page
. Liber, O.
Oprean, C. (2006). The Romanian contribution to the
development of Engineering Education.
Global Journal
of Engineering Education
,
10
, 45-50.
Nersessian, N. J. (2002). Maxwell and “the Method of
Physical Analogy”: Model-based reasoning, generic
abstraction, and conceptual change. In D. Malament
(Ed.), Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science
and Mathematics (pp. 129-166). Lasalle, Il: Open Court.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended
learning environments: Definitions and directions.
The
Quarterly Review of Distance Education
,
4
(3), 227-233.
Nicoletto, G., Anzelotti, G., & Riva, E. (2008). Mesome-
chanic strain analysis of twill-weave composite lamina
under unidirectional in-plane tension.
Composites. Part
A, Applied Science and Manufacturing
,
39
(8), 1294-1301.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.01.006
Overview of e3L. (2005). Retrieved from http://e3learn-
ing.edc.polyu.edu.hk/main.htm
Padilla-Melendez, A., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Aguila-
Obra, A. R. (2008). Factors affecting e-collaboration
technology use among management students.
Comput-
ers & Education
,
51
, 609-623. doi:10.1016/j.compe-
du.2007.06.013
Nicoletto, G., Anzelotti, G., & Riva, E. (2009). Mesoscop-
ic strain fields in woven composites: Experiments vs. finite
element modeling.
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
,
47
(3-4), 352-359. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.07.009
Page, E. B. (1968). The Use of the Computer in Analyz-
ing Student Essays.
International Review of Education
,
14
, 210-225. doi:10.1007/BF01419938
Nicoletto, G., Marin, T., Anzelotti, G., & Roncella, R.
(in press). Application of high magnification digital
image correlation technique to micromechanical strain
analysis.
Strain
.
Page, E. B. (1994). New computer grading of student
prose, using modern concepts and software.
Journal of
Experimental Education
,
62
(2), 127-142.
Noori, M. (2003).
Traditional education or learning
with computer
. Paper presented at the Virtual University
Conference at Kashan Payam-e Noor College, Kashan.
Page, E. B. (1996).
Grading essay by computer: Why the
controversy?
Handout for NCME Invited Symposium.
Nor Azan, M. Z. (2007). Learning Activities Manage-
ment System (SPAP). In
Proceedings of International
Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics,
Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia.
Palmer, J., Williams, R., & Dreher, H. (2002). Automated
essay grading system applied to a first year university
subject- How can we do it better. In
Proceedings of the
Informing Science and IT Education (InSITE) Confer-
ence, Cork, Ireland
(pp. 1221-1229).
Search WWH ::
Custom Search