Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Bergstrom. (2001). CMI Guidelines for Interoperability
AICC. Retrieved from http://www.aicc.org/docs/tech/
cmi001v3-5.pdf
Brad, S. (2005). Need for radical innovation to ensure
high quality of continuous education in engineering. In
C. Oprean, & C. Kifor (Ed.),
3rd Balkan Region Confer-
ence on Engineering Education
(pp. 77-80). Sibiu: Lucian
Blaga University Press.
Bersin, J. (2004).
The blended learning topic: Best prac-
tices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned
. San
Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Brad, S. (2008). Complex system design technique.
International Journal of Production Research
,
46
(21),
5979-6008. doi:10.1080/00207540701361475
Bhatt, R., Tang, C. P., Lee, L. F., & Knovi, V. (2009).
A case for scaffolded virtual prototyping tutorial case-
studies in engineering education.
International Journal
of Engineering Education
,
25
(1), 84-92.
Brad, S. (2009). Concurrent multifunction deployment.
International Journal of Production Research
,
47
(19),
5343-5376. doi:10.1080/00207540701564599
Bier, I.D., & Cornesky, R. (2001). Using QFD to con-
struct a higher education curriculum.
Quality Progress
,
April, 64-68.
Bransford, J. B., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999).
How People Learn
. Washington, D.C.: National Acad-
emy Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives,
Handbook I: The cognitive domain
. New York: David
McKay Co Inc.
Bransford, J. B., Franks, J. J., Vye, N., & Sherwood, R.
(1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom
can't be told . In Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.),
Similarity and analogical reasoning
(pp. 470-497).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/
CBO9780511529863.022
Bloom, B. S. (1956).
Taxonomy of educational objectives:
The classification of educational goals. Handbook I,
Cognitive domain
. New York: Longmans, Green.
Boot, E. W., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Theunissen, N.
C. M. (2008). Improving the development of instructional
software: Three building-block solutions to interrelate
design and production.
Computers in Human Behavior
,
24
, 1275-1292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.002
Brant, G., Hooper, E., & Sugrue, B. (1991). Which comes
first: The simulation or the lecture?
Journal of Educa-
tional Computing Research
,
7
(4), 469-481.
Brown, T. (2005). Toward a model for m-learning in Af-
rica.
International Journal on E-Learning
,
4
(3), 299-315.
Borau, K., Ullrich, C., & Kroop, S. (2009). Mobile learn-
ing with Open Learning Environments at Shanghai Jiao
Tong University, China.
Learning Technology publica-
tion of IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee
on Learning Technology (TCLT)
.
Learning Technology
Newsletter
,
11
(1-2), 7-9.
Bunz, U. (2005). Using scantron versus an audience
response system for survey research: Does methodology
matter when measuring computer-mediated communica-
tion competence?
Computers in Human Behavior
,
21
,
343-359. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.009
Bouras, C., Philopoulos, A., & Tsiatsos, T. (2001). e-
Learning through distributed virtual environments.
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
,
24
,
175-199. doi:10.1006/jnca.2001.0131
Burnely, S. (2007). The use of virtual reality technology
in teaching environmental engineering.
Engineering
Education
.
Journal of the Higher Education Academy
Engineering Subject Center
,
2
(2).
Boyer, E. L. (1990).
Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities
of the Professoriate
. Stanford: Carnegie Foundation for
the Advancement of Teaching.
Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Chi, L., & Chodorow,
M. (1998). Enriching automated essay scoring using
discourse marking. In
Proceedings of the Workshop on
Discourse Relations and Discourse Marking, Annual
Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics,
Montreal, Canada
.
Brackin, P. (2002). Assessing engineering education: an
industrial analogy.
International Journal of Engineering
Education
,
18
(2), 151-156.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search