Psychophysical Approach to Task Analysis - Fundamentals and Assessment Tools for Occupational Ergonomics - page 927

49. Ulin, S. S., Armstrong, T. J., Snook, S. H., and Franzblau, A., Effect of tool shape and work location
on perceived exertion for work on horizontal surfaces, American Industrial Hygiene Association
Journal, 54, 383-391, 1993.
50. Ulin, S. S., Armstrong, T. J., Snook, S. H., and Keyserling, W. M., Examination of the effect of tool
mass and work postures on perceived exertion for a screw driving task, International Journal of Indus-
trial Ergonomics, 12, 105-115, 1993.
51. Ulin, S. S., Snook, S. H., Armstrong, T. J., and Herrin, G. D., Preferred tool shapes for various hori-
zontal and vertical work locations, Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 7, 327-337,
1992.
52. Haslegrave, C. M. and Corlett, E. N., Evaluating work conditions for risk of injury-techniques for
field surveys, in Evaluation of Human Work, 2nd. ed., Wilson, J. R., and Corlett, E. N., Eds., Taylor &
Francis, London, 1995, 892-920.
53. Karwowski, W. and Ayoub, M. M., Fuzzy modelling of stresses in manual lifting tasks, Ergonomics,
27, 641-649, 1984.
54. Ayoub, M. M. and Dempsey, P. G., The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task
design, Ergonomics, 42, 17-31, 1999.
55. Gamberale, F. and Kilbom, ˚ ., An experimental evaluation of psychophysically determined
maximum acceptable workload for repetitive lifting work, in Ergonomics International 88, Adams,
A. S., Hall, R. R., McPhee, B. J., and Oxenburgh, M. S., Eds., Ergonomics Society of Australia,
Sydney, 1988, 233-235.
56. Chaffin, D. B. and Page, G. B., Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting
limits, Ergonomics, 37, 663-676, 1994.