Noise in Industry - Fundamentals and Assessment Tools for Occupational Ergonomics - page 638

6. Poulton, E. (1978). A new look at the effects of noise: a rejoinder. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1068-
1079.
7. Sorkin, R. D. (1987). Design of auditory and tactile displays. In Salvendy, G. (Ed.), Handbook of
Human Factors (pp. 549-576). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. ANSI S3.5-1997 (R2002). Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York:
American National Standards Institute, Inc.
9. ISO 7731:2003 (2003). Ergonomics — Danger Signals for Public and Work Places — Auditory Danger
Signals. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
10. Acton, W. I. (1970). Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss.
Ergonomics, 13(5), 546-554.
11. Pollack, I. (1958). Speech intelligibility at high noise levels: effects of short-term exposure. Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 282-285.
12. Morrison, H. B. and Casali, J. G. (1994). Intelligibility of synthesized voice messages in commercial
truck cab noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Proceedings of the 1994 Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, October 24-28,
pp. 801-805.
13. EPA (1981). Noise in America: the Extent of the Noise Problem. Environmental Protection Agency
Report No. 550 9-81-101. Washington, DC: EPA.

14. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Panel (1990). Noise and hearing loss.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(23), 3185-3190.
15. Melnick, W. (1991). Hearing loss from noise exposure. In Harris, C. M. (Ed.), Handbook of Acoustical
Measurements and Noise Control (pp. 18.1-18.19). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Taylor, W., Pearson, J., Mair, A., and Burns, W. (1964). Study of noise and hearing in jute weavers.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 113-120.
17. ANSI S1.4-1983 (R2001). Specification for Sound Level Meters. New York: American National Stan-
dards Institute, Inc.
18. Peterson, A. P. G. (1979). Noise measurements: instruments. In Harris, C. M. (Ed.), Handbook of
Noise Control (pp. 5-1-5-19). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. OSHA (1983). 29CFR1910.95. Occupational Noise Exposure; Hearing Conservation Amendment; Final
Rule. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Chapter
XVII, Part 1910, Subpart G, 48 FR 9776-9785. Washington, DC: Federal Register.
20. Harris, C. M. (1991), Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control. New York: McGraw-
Hill.
21. Berger, E. H. and Casali, J. G. (1997). Hearing protection devices. In Crocker, M. J. (Ed.), Encyclo-
pedia of Acoustics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Casali, J. G. and Berger, E. H. (1996). Technology advancements in hearing protection: active noise
reduction, frequency

/

amplitude-sensitivity, and uniform attenuation. American Industrial Hygiene
Association Journal, 57, 175-185.
23. Park, M. Y. and Casali, J. G. (1991). A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of
selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors. Human Factors, 33(6), 693-714.
24. EPA (1979). 40CFR211, Noise labeling requirements for hearing protectors. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Federal Register, 44(190), 56130-56147.
25. NIOSH (1975). List of Personal Hearing Protectors and Attenuation Data. National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health-HEW Publication No. 76-120, pp. 21-37. Washington, DC:
NIOSH.
26. ANSI S3.19-1974 (1974). Method for the Measurement of Real-Ear Protection of Hearing Protectors
and Physical Attenuation of Earmuffs. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.
27. Berger, E. H., Franks, J. R., and Lindgren, F. (1996). International review of field studies of hearing
protector attenuation. In Axelsson, A., Borchgrevink, H., Hamernik, R. P., Hellstrom, P., Henderson,
D., and Salvi, R. J. (Eds.), Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (pp. 361-377). New York:
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

/