Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TABLE 2.6
Summary of Epidemiologic Studies: Psychosocial Risk Factors and Work-Related Upper Extremity
Disorders
Risk Estimate
Null Association a
Positive Association
Attributable Fraction (%)
Work-Related Risk Factor
n
Range
n
Range
n
Range
Forearm
High job demands
Wrist
/
4
1.2-1.4
5
1.6-2.3
4
37-56
Low decision latitude; low control
and low stimulus from work
8
1.0-1.7
3
1.6-6.3
3
37-84
Low social support
4
3
1.4-2.1
3
28-52
Low job satisfaction
4
1.4
0
High perceived stress
1
1.5
3
Few rest break opportunities
5
2.7
2
1.5
1
33
Low support nonwork-related
4
0
Worry, tension, psychological
distress, nonwork-related
0
2
2.3-3.4
2
56-71
Shoulder / Upper Arm
High job demands
6
1.1
6
1.5-1.9
3
33-47
Low decision latitude; low control
and low stimulus from work
8
1.1
6
1.6-1.9
3
37-47
Low social support
7
1.2
5
Low job satisfaction
2
0
High perceived job stress
3
1.5
3
Few rest break opportunities
3
1
3.3
1
70
Low support nonwork-related
3
0
Worry, tension, psychological
distress, nonwork-related
1
1
4.8
79
Arm
High job demands
Elbow
/
3
1.1
6
2.0-2.4
2
50-58
Low decision latitude; low control
and low stimulus from work
5
1.0-3.0
1
2.8
1
64
Low social support
5
1.2-1.7
0
Low job satisfaction
2
0
High perceived job stress
1
1.4
2
2.0
1
50
Few rest break opportunities
1
1
3.1
1
67
Low support nonwork-related
1
0
Worry, tension, psychological
distress, nonwork-related
0
1
1.4-1.8
1
28-44
All Upper Extremity
High job demands
6
1.1-1.4
10
1.5-2.4
6
33-58
Low decision latitude; low control
and low stimulus from work
10
1.1-1.7
6
1.6-2.8
4
37-64
Low social support
7
1.2
7
1.4-2.1
3
28-52
Low job satisfaction
4
1.1-1.4
0
High perceived job stress
2
1.4
5
2.0
1
50
Few rest break opportunities
3
1.4-1.5
3
1.5-3.3
2
33-70
Low support nonwork-related
3
0
Worry, tension, psychological
distress, nonwork-related
1
3
1.4-4.8
3
28-79
Notes: n ¼ number of associations presented in epidemiologic studies. Details on studies are found in Appendix Table 2.9.
a Confidence intervals of the risk estimates included the null estimate (1.0). The magnitude of the risk estimate often was
not presented.
Source: Reprinted with permission from NACS (Musculoskeletal Disorders and the workplace. Low Back and Upper
Extremities
#
2001 by the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academics Press, Washington, D.C.)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search