Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Samaras, G.M. and Horst, R.L., A systems engineering perspective on the human-centered design of
health information systems. J. Biomed. Informatics, 38(1), 61-74, 2005.
Sears, A. and Hess, D., Cognitive walkthroughs: Understanding the effect of task description detail on
evaluator performance. Int. J. Hum. -Comput. Interact., 11 (3), 185-200, 1999.
Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J.A., and Xiao, Y., When Computers Fade
Pervasive Computing and Situa-
tionally-Induced Impairments and Disabilities, in Human-Computer Interaction: Theory and
Practice (Part II), Stephanidis, C. and Jacko, J.A. Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,
Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 1298-1302.
Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A. and Galal, G., Stakeholder Identification in the Requirements Engineering
Process. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Database & Expert Systems Applications
(DEXA), IEEE Computer Society, Florence, pp. 387-391, 1999.
Shepherd, A., HTA as a framework for task analysis, in Task Analysis, Annett, J. and Stanton, N.A. Eds.,
Taylor and Francis, New York, 2000, pp. 9-24.
Shepherd, A., Hierarchical Task Analysis. Taylor & Francis, Inc., New York, 2001.
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., and Rodrick, D., Human Factors and Ergonomics Standards, in Handbook
of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Salvendy, G. Ed., (3rd ed., pp. in press). JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 2005.
Shneiderman, B., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (3rd
ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., Reading, MA, 1998.
Sommerville, I. and Sawyer, P., Requirements Engineering: AGood Practice Guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 1997.
Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S., AGuide to Methodology in Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis., New York, 1999.
Stewart, T. and Travis, D., Guidelines, Standards, and Style Guides, in The Human-Computer Interaction
Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Jacko, J.A. and
Sears, A. Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2003, pp. 991-1005.
Sugar, W.A., What is so good about user-centered design: Documenting the effect of usability sessions on
novice software designers. J. Res. Comput. Educ., 33 (3), 235-250, 2001.
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Section 8.3: Methods, in MIL-HDBK-46855A: Department of
Defense Handbook: Human Engineering Program Processes and Procedures 1999, pp. 113-174.
Van Natta, D., Jr. and Canedy, D., The 2000 Elections: The Palm Beach Ballot. Florida Democrats Say
Ballot's Design Hurt Gore. The New York Times, p. A1, 2000.
Vicente, K.J., Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ, 1999.
Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., and Righi, C., User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Prentice-Hall,
Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
W3C., 2004 Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (W3C Working Draft). Retrieved March 8, 2004,
from http:
...
www.w3.org
TR
2004
WD-ATAG20-20040224
/
Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C. and Polson, P., The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner's
Guide, in Usability Inspection Methods, Nielsen, J. and Mack, R.L. Eds., John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1994, pp. 105-141.
Wiegers, K.E., 2000 When Telepathy Won't Do: Requirements Engineering Key Practices. Retrieved
February 22, 2005, from http:
//
/
/
/
telepathy.pdf
Wiegers, K.E., Software Requirements (2nd ed.). Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 2003.
Wixon, D., Evaluating usability methods: Why the current literature fails the practitioner. ACM Interact.,
10 (4), 28-34, 2003.
Young, R.R., Effective Requirements Practices. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA, 2001.
Young, R.R., The Requirements Engineering Handbook. Artech House, Inc., Norwood, MA, 2004.
www.processimpact.com
articles
//
/
/
Search WWH ::
Custom Search