Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
and the transform becomes
=
·
x p
y p
z p
a 2 K
+
+
x p
y p
z p
cos
abK
c sin acK
b sin
abK
+
c sin 2 K
+
cos
bcK
a sin
acK
b sin bcK
+
a sin 2 K
+
cos
where K
cos .
To test this transform, let's perform a simple rotation such as rotating the point P 110 90
about the x-axis
=
1
n
ˆ
=
i . With reference to Fig. 7.2, it is obvious that the answer is P 101.
Y
P (1,1,0)
Z
X
P ′(1,0,1)
Figure 7.2.
If
=
90 , then K
=
1
cos 90 =
1. Also, if the axis of rotation is
n
ˆ
=
i , then a
=
1b
=
0, and
c
=
0. Therefore, the transform becomes
1
0
1
100
000
010
1
1
0
=
·
which is correct.
7.3 Complex numbers
Complex numbers were discovered in the 16th century but were not fully embraced by mathe-
maticians, who tended to endorse their “imaginary” associations. Eventually, in the early 19th
century, Carl Friedrich Gauss [1777-1855] showed that complex numbers had a geometric
interpretation, and the mathematical landscape was prepared for a fertile period of discovery.
Prior to the discovery of complex numbers, it was difficult to manipulate the square roo t of
a negative number. However, with the invention of i , which could stand in place of
1, the
imaginary world of complex numbers came into being.
By definition, a complex number z has the form
z
=
a
+
i b or z
=
a
+
b i
where a and b are real quantities and i 2
=−
1. The position of i is not important, and in this
text it is placed after the scalar. An example is 2
+
3 i , where the real part is 2 and the imaginary
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search