Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
209.165.202.128 is directly connected
Are there any problems with the routing table or the EIGRP configuration?
Yes, there are no EIGRP routes in the routing table.
Verify the routing process with the
show ip protocols
command. Are there any problems
with the EIGRP configuration?
The process ID for EIGRP is incorrect.
The 172.18.129.0 network mask is incorrect. It should be 0.0.0.15. Also, BRANCH1 is not
advertising the 209.165.202.128/30 network.
If there are any problems with the EIGRP configuration, record any commands that will be
necessary to correct the configuration errors.
Because the process ID is incorrect, the entire EIGRP configuration must be redone
:
no router eigrp 2
router eigrp 1
passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
network 209.165.202.128 0.0.0.3
network 209.165.202.136 0.0.0.3
network 172.18.129.0 0.0.0.15
no auto-summary
Are there any connectivity problems that could be due to errors on other parts of the net-
work?
The protocol is down on the Serial 0/0/1 interface. However, the configuration on
BRANCH1 is correct. So, the Serial 0/0/0 interface on the BRANCH2 router should be
checked.
What connected networks are shown in the EIGRP topology table of the BRANCH1
router?
209.165.202.128/30
172.18.129.0/28
Are there any problems with the connected networks in the EIGRP topology table?
The 209.165.202.136/30 network is not in the table because the protocol is down on Serial
0/0/1.
If you have recorded any commands in the previous steps, apply them to the router config-
uration now.
Step 6.
View the routing information.
Step 7.
If any changes were made to the configuration in the previous steps, view the routing
information again.
Does the information in the routing table or other verification commands indicate any con-
figuration errors on the BRANCH1 router?
no
Does the information in the EIGRP topology table indicate any configuration errors on the
BRANCH1 router?
no
