Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
Answers and comments
1 n ,2 n , 1/2
,
to n
1 places of decimals, (
1)
, n /( n
1).
4
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
5
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
6 (i) Yes, (
.
Monotonic decreasing: (i) yes; (ii) yes (1/ n ); (iii) yes, always, a
1/ n ); (ii) yes; (iii) no, ( n ); (iv) yes, always, a
; (iv) no,
(
n ).
7 (i) Yes; (ii) yes, because if there were only a finite number, the greatest
would bean uppr bound.
8 (i) A finite list, (ii) not in order, (iii) not in original sequence when n is
odd, (iv) not in original sequence when n
1.
9 (i) 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, . . ., (ii) 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, . . ., (iii) 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, . . ., (iv) 2, 4, 6, 8,
10, . . ..
10
(i) (a) No. The n
form an increasing sequence. (b) No. The n
form a
strictly increasing sequence. (c) 5. (d) a
, an integer greater than
101 may also beused.
(ii) ( n
) is strictly increasing, so i
j
n
n
. But the sequence ( a
)
is arbitrary, so the subsequence need not be increasing.
11 (i) Yes, see qn 4(iv); (ii) not for a constant sequence.
12 Yes, the bounds for the sequence are certainly bounds for any
subsequence.
13
(i) If the subsequence is bounded above by U and bounded below
by
L
, then the sequence has max( a
, U ) as an upper bound and
) as a lower bound. 'max' is formally defined at qn 6.44.
(ii) As (i) with upper bound max( a
min( a
,
L
, a
, U ), lower bound
min( a
, a
,
L
).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search