Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 7.3 Physical characteristics and base case financial values for five
Namibian conservancies in 2000 (US$)
Conservancy
To r ra
Khoadi
Nyae
Mayuni
Salambala
//Hoas
Nyae
Characteristics
Land area (ha)
352,200
386,000
900,095
28,400
93,000
Core a wildlife area (ha)
108,586
177,650
900,095
13,300
11,000
Households (no.)
120
700
700
450
1,200
Starting wildlife density b
(ha per LSU equivalent)
427
160
464
43
3,875
Values
Project financial values
Initial capital investment ('000s)
$171
$125
$506
$111
$204
Capital investment per ha
$0.49
$0.33
$0.56
$3.88
$2.16
Capital investment per household
$1,400
$178
$723
$246
$170
Annual net cash income ('000s)
$13.7
$10.0
$38.4
$47.9
$19.2
Community financial values
Annual community cash income c ('000s) $58
$60
$29
$105
$61
Cash income per household
$487
$86
$42
$234
$51
Cash income per ha
$0.17
$0.16
$0.03
$3.74
$0.66
Annual community dividends d ('000s)
$33
$30
$16
$32
$24
Dividends per household
$273
$43
$23
$72
$20
Notes: Exchange rate used from 1 June 2000 of N$1 = US$ 0.14368. Original paper in N$
a Core areas, allocated primarily to wildlife (rest of land shared between wildlife and livestock).
b Density calculated for the total land area.
c Includes salaries and wages for conservancy employment, net cash income, and dividends.
d Annual surplus extracted for distribution to households.
Source: Barnes et al (2002)
benefits from the utilization of wildlife - mainly through joint-venture agreements
in tourism activities; and (2) non-use values (i.e. willingness to pay for conserva-
tion of the wildlife resources) through grants from donors, investing in the
CBNRM programme. Barnes et al (2002) concluded that non-consumptive and
safari-hunting tourism are particularly important income generators for all
conservancies. Also, the existence of natural wildlife populations on conservancies
(i.e. reducing the need for investments in stock) is a very significant factor affect-
ing the economic efficiency and financial viability of conservancies (also see
Chapter 16 by Barnes in this volume, for a detailed account of this research, and
more recent data).
One of the conservancies reviewed by Barnes et al (2002), the Torra conser-
vancy, is located in the Kunene region. In 2003 Torra conservancy earned income
Search WWH ::




Custom Search