Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
propagation velocities. Phase difference ∆Φ between these two modes changes
at the propagation path at
S
∆Φ = ω
c
∆µds,
(12.43)
R
where the integral is taken along the ray path; ∆µ is the real part difference
of the refractive index of two modes. Let the frequency ω
ω ci ,
then in the case of quasi-longitudinal propagation (see, e.g., [20]), from (12.6)
we get
ω pi and ω
∆µ = ω pe
ω 2
ω ce
ω
cos θ.
where θ is the angle between the ray path and B 0 .Let α be the angle between
the ray path and the vertical, then ds = dz/ cos α. Now (12.43) can be written
in the form
h s
1
2
ω pe ω ce cos θ
∆Φ =
cos α ds,
(12.44)
0
where the integration is performed up to the satellite height ( h s ) .
The Faraday rotation angle F is
F = 1
2 ∆Φ.
Substitution of ∆Φ from (12.44) into the last equation yields ([19], [21])
h s
h s
ω pe ω ce cos θ
1
2 ω 2 c
F =
cos α dz = k
N e Mdz,
(12.45)
0
0
where
e 3
2 πc 2 m e f 2
10 4
= 2 . 36
×
M = B 0 cos θ
cos α .
Equation (12.45) is written in the Gaussian system. The numerical value of
the coecient k in SI is the same: k =2 . 36
k =
,
f 2
10 4 /f 2 m 1 .
The main contribution to (12.42) and (12.45) comes from the altitude
region of up to 2
×
10 3 km [19]. Therefore, it can be assumed that M is
constant up to some limiting height h F , and zero above this height. Then
(12.45) is rewritten as
×
F = kMN F ,
(12.46)
0
h F
where N F =
N e dz. With h F = 2000 km it was found that the value of M
varies by only
3% [19]. Therefore (12.46) can be used, and changes in F
correspond to changes in N F
±
N T .
Search WWH ::




Custom Search