Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
propagation velocities. Phase difference
∆Φ
between these two modes changes
at the propagation path at
S
∆Φ
=
ω
c
∆µds,
(12.43)
R
where the integral is taken along the ray path;
∆µ
is the real part difference
of the refractive index of two modes. Let the frequency
ω
ω
ci
,
then in the case of quasi-longitudinal propagation (see, e.g., [20]), from (12.6)
we get
ω
pi
and
ω
∆µ
=
ω
pe
ω
2
ω
ce
ω
cos
θ.
where
θ
is the angle between the ray path and
B
0
.Let
α
be the angle between
the ray path and the vertical, then
ds
=
dz/
cos
α.
Now (12.43) can be written
in the form
h
s
1
cω
2
ω
pe
ω
ce
cos
θ
∆Φ
=
cos
α
ds,
(12.44)
0
where the integration is performed up to the satellite height (
h
s
)
.
The Faraday rotation angle
Ω
F
is
Ω
F
=
1
2
∆Φ.
Substitution of
∆Φ
from (12.44) into the last equation yields ([19], [21])
h
s
h
s
ω
pe
ω
ce
cos
θ
1
2
ω
2
c
Ω
F
=
cos
α
dz
=
k
N
e
Mdz,
(12.45)
0
0
where
e
3
2
πc
2
m
e
f
2
10
4
=
2
.
36
×
M
=
B
0
cos
θ
cos
α
.
Equation (12.45) is written in the Gaussian system. The numerical value of
the coecient
k
in SI is the same:
k
=2
.
36
k
=
,
f
2
10
4
/f
2
m
−
1
.
The main contribution to (12.42) and (12.45) comes from the altitude
region of up to 2
×
10
3
km [19]. Therefore, it can be assumed that
M
is
constant up to some limiting height
h
F
, and zero above this height. Then
(12.45) is rewritten as
×
Ω
F
=
kMN
F
,
(12.46)
0
h
F
where
N
F
=
N
e
dz.
With
h
F
= 2000 km it was found that the value of
M
varies by only
3% [19]. Therefore (12.46) can be used, and changes in
Ω
F
correspond to changes in
N
F
≈
±
N
T
.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search