Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
ι ( P 5 )
ι ( P 4 )
P 2
P 1
P 3
P 4
P 5
Figure 10.1 Cantor reduction on a hyperelliptic curve.
Lemma 10.3.17 Let D be an affine effective divisor on a hyperelliptic curve C with
Mumford representation ( u ( x ) ,v ( x )) . Define ( u ( x ) ,v ( x )) as in equation ( 10.10 ). Then
( u ( x ) ,v ( x )) is the Mumford representation of a semi-reduced divisor D and D
D
2 .
on C
∩ A
Proof One checks that ( u ( x ) ,v ( x )) satisfies condition ( 10.5 ) and so there is an associated
semi-reduced divisor D .
Write D
=
( P 1 )
+···+
( P n ) (where the same point can appear more than once).
∩ A
2
=
+···+
+
+···+
Then div( y
( P n + m ) for some points
P n + 1 ,...,P n + m (not necessarily distinct from the earlier n points, or from each other)
and
v ( x ))
( P 1 )
( P n )
( P n + 1 )
div( v ( x ) 2
+
H ( x ) v ( x )
F ( x ))
∩ A
2
=
div(( y
v ( x ))(
y
H ( x )
v ( x )))
∩ A
2
=
( ι ( P n + m )). Now, div( u ( x ))
( P 1 )
+
( ι ( P 1 ))
+···+
( P n + m )
+
=
( P n + 1 )
+
( ι ( P n + 1 ))
+···+
( ι ( P n + m )). It follows that D =
D +
( P n + m )
+
( ι ( P n + 1 ))
+···+
( ι ( P n + m )) and that D
=
2
div( u ( x ))
2 .
div( y
v ( x ))
∩ A
∩ A
Example 10.3.18 Consider
C : y 2
x 5
2 x 4
8 x 3
10 x 2
=
=
+
+
+
+
F ( x )
40 x
1
over
Q
.Let P 1 =
(
4 , 1) ,P 2 =
(
2 , 5) ,P 3 =
(0 , 1) and D
=
( P 1 )
+
( P 2 )
+
( P 3 ). The
x 2
Mumford representation of D is ( u ( x ) ,v ( x ))
=
( x ( x
+
2)( x
+
4) ,
4 x
+
1), which
is easily checked by noting that v ( x P i )
=
y P i for 1
i
3.
monic ( v ( x ) 2
F ( x )) /u ( x ) =
To reduce D one sets u ( x )
x 2
=
monic(
+
5 x
2) and v ( x )
v ( x )(mod u ( x ))
6)
=
( x
3)( x
=−
=
9 x
7.
One can check that div( y
v ( x ))
=
( P 1 )
+
( P 2 )
+
( P 3 )
+
( P 4 )
+
( P 5 ) where P 4 =
20), that div( u ( x ))
(2 ,
11) and P 5 =
(3 ,
=
( P 4 )
+
( ι ( P 4 ))
+
( P 5 )
+
( ι ( P 5 )) and that
div( u ( x ) ,y
v ( x ))
2
D
∩ A
=
( ι ( P 4 ))
+
( ι ( P 5 )). See Figure 10.1 for an illustration.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search