Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Lyle LLC (Loudon, TN) (Shelley 2007); glyceric acid
via
fermentation (Habe
et al
., 2009 );
and polyglycerol, through homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysis (Barrault
et al
., 2004 ).
Mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides derived from starches, cellulose, and other naturally-
derived polysaccharides, such as glucose, xylose, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose, and
cellobiose are additional inexpensive choices. Monosaccharide derivatives are also important
sources of hydrophiles. Sugar alcohols (e.g., sorbitol and xylitol) are readily produced from
monosacharides
via
hydrogenation (Wen
et al
., 2004 ), electrochemical reduction (Tang
et al
., 2004), and microbial transformation utilizing oxidoreductases (Liu
et al
., 2010 ).
Sorbitan, molecules typically consisting of a five-member ring that contain an oxygen atom,
formed from the dehydration of sorbitol, are commonly used to prepare non-ionic surfactants.
Oxidation of sacchharides produces furfuryl (De Jong
and Marcotullio
, 2010 ) and
levoglucosanyl (Lakshmanan and Hoelscher, 1970) compounds, also potentially valuable
hydrophiles. Glycols, components of alkyl glycosides and esters, are produced
via
fermentation of saccharides (Werpy and Petersen, 2004).
Polyol-based surfactants serve as an example of “non-ionic” surfactants, amphiphiles
with polar “head” groups that are uncharged. Some “anionic” and “cationic” surfactants,
amphiphiles possessing negatively and positively charged polar groups, are also bio-based
(Hayes, 2009). However, surfactants described herein, obtained through bioprocessing, are
non-ionic surfactants. Phospholipids serve as bio-based “zwitterionic” surfactants.
Amino acids can serve as surfactant hydrophiles
via
covalent attachment to their
carboxylic acid and/or amino functional groups (Infante
et al
., 2009a , 2009b ; Husmann,
2008). In addition, amino acids can be converted into ethanolamine and isopropylamine
(from serine and threonine, respectively) (Scott
et al
., 2007), which serve as hydrophiles for
cationic surfactants (Otero, 2009). DNA-derived bio-based surfactants have also been
synthesized (Leal
et al
., 2006 ; Xu
et al
., 2005 ; Bilalov
et al
., 2004 ).
Many nonionic surfactants contain poly(ethylene glycol), or equivalently, poly(ethylene
oxide), as their hydrophile, through covalent attachment to fatty acyl, fatty alcohol, or fatty
amine groups. This hydrophile is typically formed from petroleum-derived ethylene
via
synthesis of ethylene oxide, a material that is carcinogenic, mutagenic, highly flammable,
volatile, and reactive. However, in Brazil ethylene has now been derived from bioethanol
formed from fermentation of sugar cane (Gielen
et al
., 2008 ).
In addition to derivation
via
covalent attachment of bio-derived lipophiles and hydrophiles,
bio-based surfactants can be more directly synthesized from bio-renewable resources.
Mono- and di-acylglycerols are readily obtained through hydrolysis of TAG. Phospholipids
are directly obtained from soapstock, gums, and other oleochemical processing co-products.
Lysophospholipids, common emulsifiers in foods that also play important physiological
roles in phospholipid metabolism and treatment of arteriosclerosis, are obtained from
chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis of phospholipids (D'Arrigo and Servi, 2010). As described
in the following, several naturally-occurring surfactants, “biosurfactants,” can be produced
from fermentation.
10.3 INDUSTRIAL BIO-BASED SURFACTANTS
Several bio-based surfactants are being produced on an industrial scale today. Methyl ester
sulfonates (MES), derived from coconut or palm FAME (Figure 10.2), are bio-based
replacements for petroleum-derived linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) in cold-water
laundry detergents found in commercial products such as “Care Coldwash” (Danlind,
Search WWH ::
Custom Search