Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
@
I C
; @
II C
@
; @
III C
@
III C C 1
C ¼
1
C ¼
I C 1
C
C ¼
:
(11.81)
@
it follows that T 2 PK has the representation
1
@
W
I C @
W
@
W
þ @
W
T 2 PK
III C III C C 1
¼
2
I C þ
II C C
:
(11.82)
@
@
II C
@
@
This constitutive relation may also be written in a form which contains C 2 rather
than C 1 ,
1
C
@
W
I C @
II C þ @
W
W
@
W
I C @
W
þ @
W
T 2 PK
III C C 2
¼
2
I C þ
III C II C
II C þ
@
@
@
@
@
III C
@
(11.83)
by use of Cayley Hamilton theorem that states that a matrix satisfies its own
characteristic equation, thus C may replace
2
in ( 11.65 ), C 3
I C C 2
l
þ
II C C
II
I C ¼
0 . A term-by-term comparison of ( 11.78 ) with ( 11.69 ) shows that
the
coefficients a o , a 1 , and a 2 in ( 11.69 ) are given in the case of hyperelasticity by
2 @
W
I C @
II C þ @
W
W
2 @
W
I C @
W
a o ¼
I C þ
III C II C
;
a 1 ¼
II C þ
;
@
@
@
@
@
III C
2 @
W
a 2 ¼
(11.84)
@
III C
Also, in the case of an isotropic hyperelastic material, the coefficients h o ,h 1 , and
h 2 in the constitutive relation between the Cauchy stress T and the left
Cauchy-Green tensor B ,( 11.73 ), may be expressed in terms of the strain energy
function by the following formulas:
2
J
II C @
II C þ @
W
W
2
J @
W
2
J III C @
W
h o ¼
III C III C
;
h 1 ¼
I C ;
h 1 ¼
(11.85)
@
@
@
@
II C
Problems
11.9.1. Derive the result
ð@
W
=@
C
Þ¼ð@
W
=@
E
Þ : ð@
E
=@
C
Þ¼ð
1
=
2
Þð@
W
=@
E
Þ
,
( 11.78 ), using the indicial notation and the formula 2 E
¼
C
1 . Hint: It
is useful to first derive the formula
ð@
E gd =@
C ab Þ¼ð
1
=
2
Þd bd d ag
from 2 E gd
C gd d gd .
11.9.2. Derive the result ( 11.76 ) using the indicial notation. Hint: It is useful to first
derive the formula
¼
ð@
C ab =@
F ig Þ¼ð@=@
F ig Þð
F ka F kb Þ¼d ik d ag F kb þ
F ka d ik
F T · F in the indicial notation C ab
d bg
beginning from the definition C
¼
¼
F ka F kb .
Search WWH ::




Custom Search