Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
more general, more rigorous, and more elegant proofs of this result (Ene and
Sanchez-Palencia 1975 ; Sanchez-Palencia 1980 ; Burridge and Keller 1981 ) but
the one presented below suffices to make the point.
Consider the bar with axially aligned cylindrical cavities illustrated in Fig. 7.3 as
a porous medium, the pores being the axially aligned cylindrical cavities. Each pore
is identical and can be treated as a pipe for the purpose of determining the fluid flow
through it. In the case of pipe flow under a steady pressure gradient
x 3 , the
velocity distribution predicated by the Navier-Stokes equations is a parabolic
profile (compare Example 6.4.3),
@
p
=@
r o
4
;
r 2
r o
v 3 ¼ @
p
1
(7.28)
@
x 3
m
where
is the viscosity, r o is the radius of the pipe and r and x 3 are two of the three
cylindrical coordinates. The volume flow rate through the pipe is given by
m
p
r o
ð
¼ @
p
r o
8
Q
¼
2
p
rv 3 dr
m ;
(7.29)
@
x 3
0
which, multiplied by the total number of axially aligned cylindrical cavities per unit
area, n c , gives the average volume flow rate per unit area along the bar,
þ
@V ð
n c p
r o
8
1
V RVE
¼ @
p
h
q
n
q
Þ
x d s
m :
(7.30)
@
x 3
x 3 is a constant in the bar, hence the average of the
pressure gradient over the bar is given by the constant value;
The pressure gradient
@
p
=@
þ
V r
1
V RVE
¼ @
p
hr
p
p d v
x 3 ;
(7.31)
@
a result that, combined with ( 7.28 ), yields
r o
8
n c p
h
q
m hr
p
i:
(7.32)
A comparison of this representation for
h
q
i
with that of ( 7.19 ) yields the
representation for the hydraulic permeability H eff
33 in the x 3 direction,
r o
n c p
H eff
33
¼
8 m :
(7.33)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search