Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
more general, more rigorous, and more elegant proofs of this result (Ene and
Sanchez-Palencia
1975
; Sanchez-Palencia
1980
; Burridge and Keller
1981
) but
the one presented below suffices to make the point.
Consider the bar with axially aligned cylindrical cavities illustrated in Fig.
7.3
as
a porous medium, the pores being the axially aligned cylindrical cavities. Each pore
is identical and can be treated as a pipe for the purpose of determining the fluid flow
through it. In the case of pipe flow under a steady pressure gradient
x
3
, the
velocity distribution predicated by the Navier-Stokes equations is a parabolic
profile (compare Example 6.4.3),
@
p
=@
r
o
4
;
r
2
r
o
v
3
¼
@
p
1
(7.28)
@
x
3
m
where
is the viscosity,
r
o
is the radius of the pipe and
r
and
x
3
are two of the three
cylindrical coordinates. The volume flow rate through the pipe is given by
m
p
r
o
ð
¼
@
p
r
o
8
Q
¼
2
p
rv
3
dr
m
;
(7.29)
@
x
3
0
which, multiplied by the total number of axially aligned cylindrical cavities per unit
area,
n
c
, gives the average volume flow rate per unit area along the bar,
þ
@V
ð
n
c
p
r
o
8
1
V
RVE
¼
@
p
h
q
i¼
n
q
Þ
x
d
s
m
:
(7.30)
@
x
3
x
3
is a constant in the bar, hence the average of the
pressure gradient over the bar is given by the constant value;
The pressure gradient
@
p
=@
þ
V
r
1
V
RVE
¼
@
p
hr
p
i¼
p
d
v
x
3
;
(7.31)
@
a result that, combined with (
7.28
), yields
r
o
8
n
c
p
h
q
i¼
m
hr
p
i:
(7.32)
A comparison of this representation for
h
q
i
with that of (
7.19
) yields the
representation for the hydraulic permeability
H
eff
33
in the
x
3
direction,
r
o
n
c
p
H
eff
33
¼
8
m
:
(7.33)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search