Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 16.2 (continued)
Article/work
Model type
Data
Key indings/guidelines
Key limitations
Iyengar et al.
( 2011a )
Hazard model
185 doctors in three cities with
individual level data for
adoption, calls, demo-
graphic, self-reported
leadership, network data on
discussion, and patient
referral ties among
physicians supplemented
with co-location measures
The pattern of network ties is only weakly
associated with co-location of
physicians. Contagion operates through
social networks, likely driven by social
learning mitigating functional and
physical risks, as well as through
co-location, likely driven by social-
normative pressures
Unable to distinguish co-location contagion from
heterogeneity in time-invariant workplace
characteristics
Iyengar et al.
( 2011b )
Hazard model
185 doctors in three cities with
individual-level data for
adoption, calls, demo-
graphic, self-reported
leadership, network data on
discussion, and patient
referral ties among
physicians
Social contagion exists in new product
adoption after controlling for marketing
efforts and system-wide changes.
Opinion leadership and sources' volume
of product usage moderates social
contagion effects on new product
adoption
Low response rates from surveyed doctors. Small
sample size
Van den Bulte and
Iyengar ( 2011 )
Hazard model
Simulated data, medical
innovation data, and zip
code-level adoption data
from Netgrocer.com
Hazard models built on right-truncated data
can induce spurious positive duration
dependence that suggests social
contagion exists when it doesn't
Assume positive duration dependence implies
social contagion, but it could relect other
constructs
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search