Efficacy Expectations and Adherence: Evidence of Consumer Biases and Heuristics in Pharmaceutical Marketing - Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry - page 337

Johnson RD (1987) Making judgments when information is missing: inferences, biases, and framing
effects. Acta Psychol 66(1):69-82
Johnson RD (1989) Making decisions with incomplete information: the fi rst complete test of the
inference model. Adv Consum Res 16(1):522-528
Johnson RD, Levin IP (1985) More than meets the eye: the effect of missing information on
purchase evaluations. J Consum Res 12(2):169-177
Johnson EJ, Tversky A (1983) Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. J Pers Soc Psychol
45(1):20-31
Johnson EJ, Meyer RK, Ghose S (1989) When choice models fail: compensatory models in
negatively correlated environments. J Mark Res 26(3):255-270
Johnson EJ, Hershey J, Meszaros J, Kunreuther H (1993) Framing, probability distortions, and
insurance decisions. J Risk Uncertainty 7(1):35-51
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica
47:263-291
Kardes FR, Cronley ML, Kellaris JJ, Posavac SS (2004a) The role of selective information
processing in price-quality inference. J Consum Res 31(2):368-374
Kardes FR, Posavac SS, Cronley ML (2004b) Consumer inferences: a review of processes, bases,
and judgment contexts. J Consum Psychol 14(3):230-256
Katapodi MC, Facione NC, Humphreys JC, Dodd MJ (2005) Perceived breast cancer risk: heuristic
reasoning and search for a dominance structure. Soc Sci Med 60(2):421-432
Knapp P, Raynor DK, Berry DC (2004) Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information
to patients about the side effects of medicines. Qual Saf Health Care 13(3):176-180
Kramer T, Irmak C, Block L, Ilyuk V (2011) The effect of a no-pain, no-gain lay theory on product
effi cacy perceptions. Working paper
Kraus N, Malmfors T, Slovic P (1992) Intuitive toxicology: expert and lay judgments of chemical
risks. Risk Anal 12(2):215-232
Kruglanski A, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing”.
Psychol Rev 103(2):263-283
Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK (2001) General performance on a numeracy scale. Med Decis
Making 21(1):37-44
Loden J, Schooler C (2000) Patient compliance. Pharm Exec 20(7):88-94
Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127(2):267-286
Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, Wahrenberger JW, Ross JM (1993) The framing effect of
relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med 8(1):543-548
McMorrow B (2002) No pain, no gain. California Law Business, March 18. http://www.mcmorrowsa-
varese.com/nopainnogain.html . Accessed 29 April 2009
McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A (1982) On the elicitation of preferences for alternative
therapies. N Engl J Med 306(21):1259-1262
Menon G, Block LG, Ramanathan S (2002) We're at as much risk as we are led to believe: effects
of message cues on judgments of health risk. J Consum Res 28(4):533-549
Menon A, Deshpande A, Perri M, Zinkhan G (2003) Consumers' attention to the brief summary in
print direct-to-consumer advertisements: perceived usefulness in patient-physician discussions.
J Public Policy Mark 22:181-191
National Council on Patient Information and Education (2007) Enhancing prescription medicine
adherence: a national action plan. http://www.talkaboutrx.org/documents/enhancing_prescription_
medicine_adherence.pdf . Accessed 1 Dec 2011
Natter HM, Berry DC (2005) Effects of presenting the baseline risk when communicating absolute
and relative risk reductions. Psychol Health Med 10(4):326-334
Pain D (2009) No pain, no gain: more means less when it comes to profi t and loss. The Independent,
April 29. http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/no-pain-no-gain-more-means-
lesswhen-it-comes-to-profi t-and-loss-1670308.html . Accessed 29 April 2009
Pechmann C, Ratneshwar S (1992) Consumer covariation judgments: theory or data driven?
J Consum Res 19(3):373-386