Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
102. Amelinckx S, Zhang XB, Bernaerts D, Zhang XF, Ivanov V, and Nagy JB. A for-
mation mechanism for catalytically grown helix-shaped graphite nanotubes.
Science
1994;265:635-9.
103. Nikolaev P. Gas-phase production of single-walled carbon nanotubes from
carbon monoxide: A review of the HiPco process.
J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.
2004;4:307-16.
104. Webster TJ and Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals:
Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo.
Biomaterials
2004;25:4731-9.
105. de Oliveira PT and Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregu-
lates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic
cells.
Biomaterials
2004;25:403-13.
106. Elias KL, Price RL, and Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nano-
meter diameter carbon fibers.
Biomaterials
2002;23:3279-87.
107. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, and Webster TJ. Nanostructured polymer/
nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion.
Tissue Eng.
2002;8:753-61.
108. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, and Bizios R. Design and evaluation of nanophase alu-
mina for orthopaedic/dental applications.
Nanostruct. Mater.
1999;12:983-6.
109. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, and Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceram-
ics.
Biomaterials
1999;20:1221-7.
110. Du C, Cui FZ, Zhu XD, and de Groot K. Three-dimensional nano-HAp/
collagen matrix loading with osteogenic cells in organ culture.
J. Biomed. Mater.
Res.
1999;44:407-15.
111. Zhu XL, Eibl O, Scheideler L, and Geis-Gerstorfer J. Characterization of nano
hydroxyapatite/collagen surfaces and cellular behaviors.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
A
2006;79A:114-27.
112. Herten M, Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Friesen K, Koegler G, and Becker J. Surface-
and nonsurface-dependent
in vitro
effects of bone substitutes on cell viability.
Clin. Oral Investig.
2008;2:149-55.
113. Laschke MW, Witt K, Pohlemann T, and Menger MD. Injectable nanocrystalline
hydroxyapatite paste for bone substitution:
In vivo
analysis of biocompatibility
and vascularization.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.
2007;82:494-505.
114. Busenlechner D, Tangl S, Mair B et al. Simultaneous
in vivo
comparison of bone
substitutes in a guided bone regeneration model.
Biomaterials
2008;29:3195-200.
115. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Herten M et al. Dimensional ridge alterations following
socket preservation using a nanocrystalline oxyapatite paste. A histomorpho-
metrical study in dogs.
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
2008;37:741-7.
116. Meirelles L, Albrektsson T, Kjellin P et al. Bone reaction to nano hydroxyapatite
modified titanium implants placed in a gap-healing model.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
A
2008;87A:624-31.
117. Shields KJ, Beckman MJ, Bowlin GL, and Wayne JS. Mechanical proper-
ties and cellular proliferation of electrospun collagen type II.
Tissue Eng.
2004;10:1510-7.
118. Zhang Y, Venugopal JR, El Turki A, Ramakrishna S, Su B, and Lim CT.
Electrospun biomimetic nanocomposite nanofibers of hydroxyapatite/chitosan
for bone tissue engineering.
Biomaterials
2008;29:4314-22.
119. Zhang YZ, Ouyang HW, Lim CT, Ramakrishna S, and Huang ZM. Electrospin-
ning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds.
J. Biomed.
Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.
2005;72B:156-65.