Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
43. Fthenakis, V.; Kim, H.C.; Gualtero, S.; Bourtsalas, A. Nanomaterials in PV man-
ufacture: Some life cycle environmental and health considerations.
Conference
Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference
2009
,
1068-1073.
44. Roes, A.L.; Alsema, E.A.; Blok, K.; Patel, M.K. Ex-ante environmental and eco-
nomic evaluation of polymer photovoltaics.
Prog. Photovoltaics
2009
,
17,
372-393.
45. Greijer, H.; Karlson, L.; Lindquist, S.; Hagfeldt, A. Environmental aspects of
electricity generation from a nanocrystalline dye sensitized solar cell system.
Renew. Energy
2001
,
23,
27-39.
46. Osterwalder, N.; Capello, C.; Hungerbohler, K.; Stark, W.J. Energy consumption
during nanoparticle production: How economic is dry synthesis?
J. Nanopart.
Res.
2006
,
8,
1-9.
47. Espinosa, N.; Garcia-Valverde, R.; Krebs, F.C. Life-cycle analysis of product inte-
grated polymer solar cells.
Energy Environ. Sci.
2011
,
4,
1547-1557.
48. Espinosa, N.; Garcia-Valverde, R.; Urbina, A.; Krebs, F.C. A life cycle analysis of
polymer solar cell modules prepared using roll-to-roll methods under ambient
conditions.
Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells
2011
,
95,
1293-1302.
49. Lloyd, S.M.; Lave, L.B.; Matthews, H.S. Life cycle benefits of using nanotechnol-
ogy to stabilize platinum-group metal particles in automotive catalysts.
Environ.
Sci. Technol.
2005
,
39,
1384-1392.
50. Moign, A.; Vardelle, A.; Themelis, N.J.; Legoux, J.G. Life cycle assessment of
using powder and liquid precursors in plasma spraying: The case of yttria-
stabilized zirconia.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
2010
,
205,
668-673.
51. Krishnan, N.; Boyd, S.; Dornfeld, D.; Somani, A.; Raoux, S.; Clark, D. A hybrid
life cycle inventory of nano-scale semiconductor manufacturing.
Environ. Sci.
Technol.
2008
,
42,
3069-3075.
52. Wen, D. Nanofuel as a potential secondary energy carrier.
Energy Environ. Sci.
2010
,
3,
591-600.
53. Meyer, D.E.; Curran, M.A.; Gonzalez, M.A. An examination of existing data for
the industrial manufacture and use of nanocomponents and their role in the life
cycle impact of nanoproducts.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
2009
,
43,
1256-1263.
54. Gavankar, S.; Suh, S.; Keller, A.F. Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: Review and
recommendations.
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
2012
,
17,
295-303.
55. Steinfeldt, M. A method of prospective technological assessment of nanotechno-
logical techniques, In
Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management
;
Finkbeiner,
M., ed.; Springer: The Netherlands,
2011
, pp. 131-140.
56. Upadhyayula, V.K.K.; Meyer, D.E.; Curran, M.A.; Gonzalez, M.A. Life cycle
assessment as a tool to enhance the environmental performance of carbon nano-
tube products: A review.
J. Clean. Prod.
2012
,
26,
37-47.
57. Olsen, S.I. and Miseljic, M. Assessing potential nanoparticle release during
nanocomposite shredding using direct-reading instruments, In
Symposium
“Safety Issues of Nanomaterials Along Their Life Cycle,” May 4-5, 2011,
Barcelona,
Spain,
2011
.
58. Hischier, R. and Walser, T. Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials:
State of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps.
Sci. Total Environ.
2012
,
425,
271-282.
59. Hauschild, M.Z.; Huijbregts, M.; Jolliet, O.; Macleod, M.; Margni, M.;
Rosenbaum, R.K.; van de Meent, D.; McKone, T.E. Building a model based on
scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: The search for
harmony and parsimony.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
2008
,
42,
7032-7037.