Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
8. Liu, Y., Tong, Z., and Prud'homme, R.K., Stabilized polymeric nanoparticles for
controlled and efficient release of bifenthrin.
Pest. Manag. Sci.
, 64, 808, 2008.
9. ABA,
The Adequacy of FIFRA to Regulate Nanotechnology-Based Pesticides
.
American Bar Association; Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources. May
2006. Publication 505.33 (FIFRA Nano Paper_.doc) Chicago, IL.
10. Navarro, E. et al. Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered
nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi.
Ecotoxicology
, 17, 372, 2008.
11. Handy, R.D. et al. The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanopar-
ticles.
Ecotoxicology
, 17, 287, 2008.
12. Handy, R.D., Owen, R., and Valsami-Jones, E. The ecotoxicology of nanoparti-
cles and nanomaterials: Current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future
needs.
Ecotoxicology
, 17, 315, 2008.
13. Klaine, S.J. et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailabil-
ity, and effects.
Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
, 27, 1825, 2008.
14. Neal, A.L. What can be inferred from bacterium-nanoparticle interactions about the
potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles.
Ecotoxicology
,
17, 362, 2008.
15. Borm, P.J.A. et al. The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for
ECETOC.
Part. Fibre Toxicol.
, 3, 1, 2006.
16. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority,
Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity
of Engineered Nanoparticles
, Report TA 2304/2007, Joner, E.J., Hartnik, T., and
Amundsen, C.E., eds., Bioforsk, Ås., 2008, 64 pp.
17. Handy, R.D. et al. Manufactured nanoparticles: Their uptake and effects on
fish—A mechanistic analysis,
Ecotoxicology
, 17, 396, 2008.
18. Higarashi, M.M. and Jardim, W.F. Remediation of pesticide contaminated soil
using TiO
2
mediated by solar light.
Catal. Today
, 76, 201, 2002.
19. Quinn, J. et al. Field demonstration of DNAPL dehalogenation using emulsified
zero-valent iron.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
, 39, 1309, 2005.
20. Monteil-Rivera, F. et al. Reduction of octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetra-
zocine by zerovalent iron: Product distribution.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
, 39, 9725,
2005.
21. Rejeski, D.
CPSC FY2010 Agenda and Priorities
, Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars, Available at:
http://www.nanotechproject.org
., accessed
October 2009.
22. Tran, C.L. et al.
A Scoping Study to Identify Hazard Data Needs for Addressing the
Risks Presented by Nanoparticles and Nanotubes
, IOM Research Report, Edinburgh,
UK, 2005.
23. Kaegi, R. et al. Synthetic TiO
2
nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into
the aquatic environment.
Environ. Pol.
, 156, 233, 2008.
24. Mueller, N.C. and Nowack, B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles
in the environment.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
, 42, 4447, 2008.
25. Tiede, K. et al. Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing
to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles.
J. Chromatogr. A
, 1216, 503, 2009.
26. Ogilvie Robichaud, C. et al. Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO
2
production as a basis for exposure assessment.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
, 43, 4227, 2009.
27. Gottschalk, F. et al. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nano-
materials (TiO
2
, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions.
Environ. Sci.
Technol.
, 43, 9216, 2009.
