Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
In fact the Laplace transform of ( 7.155 ) can, using ( 7.159 ), be written
1
R
(
u
) =
,
(7.160)
ψ(
1
u
)
from which it is clear that the number of events is determined directly by the event prob-
ability density. Note that the aged event probability density
t )
ψ(
t
,
expressed by ( 7.154 )
requires an independent determination of
, to which we now turn our attention.
To realize the phenomenological condition necessary for R
ψ(
t
)
→∞
requires that the reduction of response intensity may, but need not, have a lower
limit, depending on whether or not the statistics of the neural network are ergodic
or non-ergodic. To establish this condition, consider the relation between the rate of
event production and the event probability density given in Laplace space by ( 7.160 ).
Recalling the Laplace transform of the hyperbolic distribution
(
t
)
to decrease as t
) μ 1 e uT
1
ψ(
E uT
μ
u
) =
1
)(
1
μ)(
uT
,
(7.161)
we can write the asymptotic expansion as u
0 to obtain to lowest order in u in the
case of no finite first moment
0 ψ(
) μ 1
lim
u
u
) =
1
(
2
μ)(
uT
+··· ;
1
<μ<
2
,
(7.162)
and for a finite first moment but a diverging second moment
0 ψ(
) μ 1
lim
u
u
) =
1
+
u
t
(
2
μ)(
uT
+··· ;
2
<μ<
3
,
(7.163)
in which the lowest-order terms in powers of u of the two functions in ( 7.161 ) have been
retained in both expressions. Inserting ( 7.162 ) into the expression for the rate of event
production yields
μ
1
) = (
uT
)
0 R
lim
u
(
u
μ) ;
1
<μ<
2
,
(7.164)
(
2
and inserting ( 7.163 ) yields
1
(
2
μ)
0 R
lim
u
(
u
) =
μ ;
2
<μ<
3
,
(7.165)
2
3
u
t
t
(
uT
)
respectively. Using the Tauberian theorem relating the time and Laplace domains,
t n 1
(
1
u n
) ,
(7.166)
n
we obtain from ( 7.164 ) for the rate of event production as t
→∞
for the non-ergodic
case
T
t
2 μ
sin
[ π(μ
1
) ]
R
(
t
)
;
1
<μ<
2
,
(7.167)
π
T
and for the ergodic case
1
μ 2 ; 2
T
t
1
1
R
(
t
)
+
<μ<
3
.
(7.168)
t
3
μ
Search WWH ::




Custom Search