Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Which methods discussed in this chapter accomplish this? How would reducing
the variability impact the estimated energy production, in general?
REFERENCES
1. Vautard R, Cattiaux J, Yiou P, Thepaut J-N, Ciais P. Northern Hemisphere atmospheric
stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat GeoSci 2010;3:756 - 761.
2. Pryor SC, Barthelmie RJ, Young DT, Takle ES, Arritt RW, Flory D, Gutowski Jr. WJ,
Nunes A, Roads J. Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States. J Geophys Res
2009;114:D14105. doi: 10.1029/2008JD011416, 2009.
3. Freedman JM, Zack JW. Climate and Wind Energy: Outlook for Wind in a World Undergo-
ing Climate Change — Recent Trends in Wind Speed, American Wind Energy Association
Wind Power 2007, June 2007.
4. Breslow PB, Sailor DJ. Vulnerability of wind power resources to climate change in the
continental United States. Renew Energy 2002;27:585 - 598.
5. Sailor DJ, Smith M, Hart M. Climate change implications for wind power resources in the
Northwest United States. Renew Energy 2008;33:2393 - 2406.
6. Freedman JM. Final Report: effects of climate change on production of electricity from
wind power in California. California Energy Commission; 2009.
7. Ren D. Effects of global warming on wind energy availability. J Renew Sustain Energy
2010;2:052301.
8. Federal Meteorological Handbook No.3. Rawinsonde and Pibal Observations, Office of the
Federal Coordinator for Meteorology, 29 May 2007.
9. Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins W, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki
W, Kanamitsu M, Kousky V, van den Dool H, Jenne R, Fiorino M. The NCEP/NCAR
reanalysis. Bull Am Met Soc 2001;8:247 - 267.
10. Brower MC. The Use of NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Data in MCP, AWS Truepower; 2006.
11. Waight K. Validation of MASS wind anomaly simulations: 1997 - 2006, AWS Truepower;
March 2008.
12. Rogers A, Rogers J, Manwell J. Comparison of the performance of four measure-correlate-
predict algorithms. J Wind Energy Ind Aerodyn 2005;93:243 - 264.
13. Thoegersen ML. Measure-correlate-predict methods: case studies and software implemen-
tation. Milan, Italy: European Wind Energy Conference; 2007.
14. Anderson M. A Review of MCP techniques. UK: Renewable Energy Systems Ltd.; 2004.
15. Oliver A, Zarling K. Time of day correlations for improved wind speed predictions.
Chicago, Illinois: American Wind Energy Association, Windpower 2009, May 2009.
Renewable Energy Systems, Ltd.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER READING
Rogers A, Rogers J, Manwell J. Comparison of the performance of four measure-correlate-
predict algorithms. J Wind Energy Ind Aerodyn 2005;93:243 - 264. Available at http://www-
unix.ecs.umass.edu/ arogers/_html_version/publications/_publicationpdfs/AnthonyRogers_
2005_JWEIA_Measure_Correlate_Predict.pdf. (Accessed 2012).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search